Democracy
had proved to be a disappointment to "nearly everyone in Greek
intellectual circles in the mid-4th century BC." (63) Has democracy in our
time disappointed you? Can you give a rousing defense of democratic practice,
not just democratic theory? Are we living through another time of epochal
democratic decline, or are you hopeful that our politics will rally?
Don Enss
What has disappointed me
the most is a lack of individuals making the effort as citizens to be informed,
and then registering and voting in elections that impact their lives? Twenty
years ago, Tennessee had an extremely well-qualified Supreme Court Justice,
Penny White. I knew her. A small group of individuals in a well-coordinated
campaign focused on removing her from the Supreme Court. They accused her of
being evil. They said that she was soft on crime and anti-death penalty because
she along with the other four justices returned a murder case to the lower
court for resentencing. A family accused her of murdering their daughter by her
decision.
Unbelievably, on election
night approximately nineteen percent of the registered voters cast a ballot on
whether to retain her or not. Ten percent of all registered voters voted her
out. Ten percent!! This is what I find most troubling about our democracy. Paul
Weyrich was the founder of the conservative American Legislative Exchange
Council (ALEC) which has crafted the model legislation behind closed doors, not
open to the public, which affects many aspects of our lives. One example is the
Voter Photo Id laws being introduced around the country by state legislators
who are members of ALEC. Weyrich stated that he didn’t want everyone to vote,
that their leverage goes up as the voting populace goes down. Sadly, the press has taken an indifferent attitude
to ALEC’s secret meetings by saying as Herman quotes, “that’s the way things
are,” (75) and instead of informing the public of these organizations and their
efforts to thwart democracy, they focus more on trying to entertain the public with
inane, long-winded, and hackneyed conversations and meaningless “so-called expert”
discussions.
But I am an eternal
optimist and regardless of one’s political affiliation, this year’s election
appears to be one that will engage more citizens in the process and hopefully
that will translate into a few better informed citizens who will turn out to
cast a ballot. If you are a Trump or Sanders supporter, then your focus may be
on change from the current system and if you’re a Clinton supporter you may be
focused on continuing to make improvements in jobs, healthcare, education, and
the economy from the Great Recession. Regardless of whom wins, it would be nice
to see Civics required as part of our elementary public education curriculum.
For me that is our best hope, especially if it is taught by teachers who are
grounded in philosophy, enthusiastic about teaching it, and relate it to
historical and current events.
Because we have three
branches of government, it is doubtful that anyone of these three candidates
when one of them is elected will be able to significantly alter our government
based on what they say on the campaign trail. The greater concern is what
happens on the local level by small groups of individuals who are working to
further a particular agenda that is not open to public scrutiny.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.