The Economic Times daily newspaper is available online now.

    Samsung hit with $303 million jury verdict in computer-memory patent lawsuit

    Synopsis

    The jury in Marshall, Texas, determined after a six-day trial that Samsung's "memory modules" for high-performance computing willfully infringed all five patents that Netlist accused the Korean tech giant of violating.

    Samsung lawsuitAP
    Irvine, California-based Netlist sued Samsung in 2021, alleging Samsung memory products used in cloud-computing servers and other data-intensive technology infringe its patents
    Computer-memory company Netlist Inc convinced a federal jury in Texas on Friday to award it more than $303 million for Samsung Electronics Co's infringement of several patents related to improvements in data processing.
    The jury in Marshall, Texas, determined after a six-day trial that Samsung's "memory modules" for high-performance computing willfully infringed all five patents that Netlist accused the Korean tech giant of violating.

    Elevate Your Tech Prowess with High-Value Skill Courses

    Offering CollegeCourseWebsite
    MITMIT Technology Leadership and InnovationVisit
    IIT DelhiIITD Certificate Programme in Data Science & Machine LearningVisit
    Indian School of BusinessISB Product ManagementVisit
    Representatives for the companies did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Netlist stock was up 21% following the verdict on Friday afternoon.

    Irvine, California-based Netlist sued Samsung in 2021, alleging Samsung memory products used in cloud-computing servers and other data-intensive technology infringe its patents. Netlist said its innovations increase the power efficiency of memory modules and allow users to "derive useful information from vast amounts of data in a shorter period of time."

    A Netlist attorney told the jury that Samsung took its patented module technology after the companies had collaborated on another project, according to a court transcript.

    Netlist had asked the jury for $404 million in damages.

    Samsung had argued that the patents were invalid and that its technology worked in a different way than Netlist's inventions.
    The Economic Times

    Stories you might be interested in