Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to navigation
Bernie Sanders Holds Campaign Rally In South Bend, INSOUTH BEND, IN - MAY 01: Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders (D-VT) speaks during a campaign rally at the Century Center on May 1, 2016 in South Bend, Indiana. Sanders continues to campaign leading up to the state of Indiana’s primary day on Tuesday. (Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images)
‘How can Sanders still be failing to talk about racism at every turn, especially heading into the primary in California, a state with more Latinos than whites?’ Photograph: Joe Raedle/Getty Images
‘How can Sanders still be failing to talk about racism at every turn, especially heading into the primary in California, a state with more Latinos than whites?’ Photograph: Joe Raedle/Getty Images

Bernie Sanders isn't winning minority votes – and it's his own fault

This article is more than 7 years old
Steven W Thrasher

The senator should be making racism a cornerstone of his stump speech, but instead he’s practically ceding black and Latino voters to Hillary Clinton

On Sunday, I went to Bernie Sanders’s press conference in Washington DC. As a black voter who has “felt the Bern”, I wanted to see what he was going to do to reignite his dwindling flame – especially as I had just seen his slogan co-opted and reduced to “feel the burn” at a DC bus stop promoting check-ups for sexually transmitted diseases.

I left the press event extremely disappointed. Sanders lectured us about super-delegates. He obsessed over the possibility of Hillary Clinton failing to win enough pledged delegates. He spoke of a contested convention, and he recycled his well-worn talking points about inequality.

Two things he failed to mention: black and Hispanic voters, two constituencies whose support he has failed, repeatedly, to gain.

I get that he thinks the lives of people of color will be improved by reining in Wall Street, curbing financial inequality and confronting climate change. But any democratic socialist should know that the economic violence of capitalism is specifically gendered and racialized, that Wall Street explicitly harms black and brown people and that the effects of climate change are racist. Indeed, Sanders knows this and his platforms address it.

How, then, can Sanders still be failing to talk about racism, anti-blackness and anti-Latino sentiment at every turn, especially heading into the primary in California, a state with more Latinos than whites? If you listen to what Sanders is actually saying in this late stage of the game, he seems much more interested in open primaries, independent voters and super-delegates than he is in voters of color or the disenfranchised. That’s unsettling.

I have also noticed white leftists who feel the Bern starting to whisper that if Sanders doesn’t beat Clinton, it’s the fault of the unenlightened black and brown folks who didn’t vote in their own interest. Their condescension is misplaced; their ire should be with their candidate. I have written about my wonder at why the Clintons enjoy such robust support from black people when the Clintonian legacy resulted in generations of incarcerated black men, broken families and terrible economics.

But votes aren’t owed to anyone, and if Sanders doesn’t win the black vote, it’s his own fault (and, possibly, that of the people he has chosen to advise him). You can’t blame the Clintons – they have handed Sanders one unforced error after another, from Hillary praising the Reagans on Aids and joking about “CPT” (“colored-people time”) to Bill yelling at a protester that black lives matter in Africa.

Sanders does pivot well to talking about race when forced to – I loved how he gave the stage to the protesters in Seattle and came up with a robust HIV/Aids plan after Hillary’s insane Reagan worship. But it’s often in reaction, and it seems like the Clintons could burn down a black church while wearing white sheets and Sanders would still fail to talk about race and racism on the regular.

His underlying view – that racism will be ameliorated by curbing Wall Street and excessive capitalism – is right: black and brown Americans would fare much better under this approach than we would under Hillary Clinton’s Wall Street influence or the color-blind “rising tide will lift all boats” nonsense that Obama espoused. But no corrective of American economics can be color-blind while creating equality for people of all races. This is what Sanders either doesn’t get, or doesn’t seem inclined to discuss.

And it’s agonizing because Sanders has gotten within striking distance of Hillary Clinton. I do honestly believe his policies would be far better for black and brown America than Clinton’s. I voted for him in New York, and I hope he can find a way to pull off a win with the DNC. But as his chances dwindle, and as he still fails to specifically address racism at every turn, he’s erasing his own best chance.

The emerging black and brown coalition – first harnessed electorally under President Obama, and more radicalized because of Black Lives Matter – doesn’t want a Trump v Clinton death match. It does not suffer from a failure of political imagination or feel checkmated. But it does want to be considered beyond moments of crisis.

The failure to connect more broadly with this coalition is on Senator Sanders, who still can’t seem to imagine a path to victory in which the defeat of racism is foregrounded at all times. It’s as if he’s willing to let a technical defeat with super-delegates from past states swallow him up when he could be mobilizing an electric, unbeatable black and brown force in California.

Most viewed

Most viewed