“What I said was my personal opinion. It does not reflect an official USG policy position,” P. J. Crowley, the State Department spokesman, told Foreign Policy’s Josh Rogin. (“USG” is Crowley’s employer, the U.S. government.) That personal opinion, expressed at an event at M.I.T., was that the treatment of Bradley Manning, the soldier accused of giving classified files to WikiLeaks, was “ridiculous and counterproductive and stupid.” He added, “Nonetheless, Bradley Manning is in the right place.” If he’s in the right place, does that mean that the officials overseeing his detention are in the wrong ones? Hard to say; Crowley, in confirming the remarks, told Rogin, “I defer to the Department of Defense regarding the treatment of Bradley Manning.”
Given the news lately, it’s almost remarkable that this wasn’t said on Twitter, or to someone with a hidden camera posing as an improbable figure. (Who would have been the character best positioned to elicit this from Crowley—fake David Koch to his Scott Walker, pretend Muslim Brotherhood associates to his NPR executive?) The event was sponsored by M.I.T.’s Center for Future Civic Media, and Philippa Thomas, one of the attendees, who first blogged about this, wrote,
There we are. (Jeffrey Toobin and I spoke a bit about the Manning case during our Political Scene podcast this week.) And where is Obama? Jake Tapper, of ABC News, asked the President about it at his news conference Friday:
So the State Department spokesman, in whatever capacity, said that something was stupid, but the Pentagon said it was appropriate. Does that get at the “substantive issue”?