Home Online Advertising AdBlock Plus Parent Eyeo Ventures Into Programmatic

AdBlock Plus Parent Eyeo Ventures Into Programmatic

SHARE:

The German software company eyeo GmbH, which owns Adblock Plus (ABP) and created the Acceptable Ads whitelisting program, will launch its first programmatic technology for reaching ad-blocking audiences on Wednesday.

The Acceptable Ads Exchange (AAX) has been in in alpha testing since February with three DSPs – one in the US and two in Europe – and a few global media companies as inventory sources, said CEO Till Faida.

“It’s still in beta phase, but it’s ready to wind up now,” Faida said.

The early inventory and demand partners have not been disclosed. And though there are only a handful of participants, Faida said the network already reaches 40 of the top 100 most-trafficked sites in the US and 20% of the top 10,000 sites worldwide.

The AAX is an exchange where buyers can target users of the ad blockers ABP, AdBlock or Crystal, which have opted into Acceptable Ads.

“We feel like we’ve been doing this Acceptable Ads program for quite a while, and it’s been validated and is working well for publishers,” Faida said.

Eyeo has charted a treacherous course since it pivoted into ad tech two years ago.

Eyeo first dipped its toe in programmatic by partnering with ComboTag, an Israeli SSP startup that pitched its platform seats with Google AdX and AppNexus as a way to sell ad-blocking inventory on industry-leading DSPs. But Eyeo was promptly rebuffed when both Google and AppNexus kicked ComboTag and ABP off their platforms and denounced their business model.

“[ComboTag] won’t have a seat on the [AdX] exchange,” said Sridhar Ramaswamy, Google’s senior VP of ads and commerce, at DMEXCO 2016 in Germany. “We are pretty sure we don’t want to be in a business relationship that facilitates [what’s] gone on.”

At the same time, eyeo has fended off a new generation of ad blockers, like uBlock and uBlock Origin, that take a harder line against all ads. UBlock and uBlock Origin sell themselves against the fact that ABP and AdBlock, the world’s two most popular ad blockers, monetize users.

“Some people hate all online ads, and we won’t convince them to embrace Acceptable Ads, but we have a user base that understands the economics of the web and wants a healthy compromise,” Faida said. “That’s part of why I hope that this time around, this notion won’t be so controversial anymore.”

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Only 6–7% of ABP users opt out of the Acceptable Ads program, he said.

The new AAX business, a US-based subsidiary within the eyeo holding company, will have a few strategic advantages that Faida believes will help it prosper, even as supply-side tech companies are plagued by shrinking margins.

“What makes AAX unique in the space is that it’s truly a different audience,” he said. “Everyone is targeting the same audiences and exchanges right now, and that means it’s hard to differentiate.”

Eyeo also has a growing team of more than 100 engineers contributing to the product, which AAX couldn’t support on its own without considerable funding.

Some publishing industry lobbyists have for years called out companies like Criteo, Taboola and Google – which on its own reportedly accounts for most of eyeo’s overall revenue – for paying whitelisting fees and legitimizing the ad blocker monetization model.

AAX will take a 20% cut of budgets spent on the platform – compared to Rubicon Project’s take rate, which dropped from 21% a year ago to 12% in the previous quarter. It’s a large margin compared to other programmatic exchanges, but the existing Acceptable Ads products take a 30% cut.

“Since we’re participating one step higher in the supply chain in this case, it’s consistent with that on a net basis,” Faida said.

The new ad blocker inventory exchange will be similar to other programmatic exchanges, he said, except for one switch to its auction dynamics making it easier and cheaper for advertisers to win inventory if their creative has positive user feedback.

Must Read

Why White Claw’s Parent Company Is Pouring Investment Into Headless Commerce

A booze brand and a “headless commerce” platform walk into a meeting with the CFO. That might sound like the setup for a punchline, but it’s just how mar tech works these days.

As MMM Rides Again, Google Finds Its Place In The Conversation With Meridian

Tracking is a mess. Attribution is broken beyond repair. IP address identity data may go the way of the dodo. Which means marketing mix modeling is back, baby!

Comic: Shopper Marketing Data

The Rise Of Ecommerce Ad Metrics

As ecommerce adoption has grown, measurement has shifted away from proxies towards metrics that show business results – a move away from clicks and views towards sales and profitable growth.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Comic: Off-Platform Media

How RMNs Use MFA And Cheap Inventory To Game Attribution Rules

Retail media is built on its attribution quality, but real purchases can be gamed by programmatic metrics and create perverse incentives for RMNs to serve ads across low-quality inventory.

There’s A Lot Wrong With Google’s And Meta’s Non-Transparent ‘Refund’ Practices

Google and Meta are playing with fire. Their opaque refund practices have already exposed them to customer blowback – and could lead to class-action lawsuits by disgruntled advertisers.

Comic: The Great Online Privacy Battle

How US Intelligence Agencies Buy And Use Programmatic Data For Surveillance

Mike Yeagley, an independent contractor who has scouted and acquired commercial data and technology on behalf of intelligence agencies, is one of the earliest evangelists of using ad tech tracking information to identify and surveil government targets.