Skip to main content

October 2017 ENSO update: Still watching for La Niña

The task of a climate forecaster is to see the forest, and not get hung up on the individual trees. Especially that extra tall one over there, with the gnarl that looks like a face, and the low branches that would be so easy to climb, and… uh, right. My point is that we try to look beyond shorter-term weather to see longer-term monthly and seasonal patterns. After all, a particular winter can have several colder-than-average days and still be warmer than average overall.

Which brings me to the current situation in the tropical Pacific! The October ENSO forecast says La Niña conditions are favored during the fall and winter 2017-18, but at press time the ocean-atmosphere system didn’t quite meet the criteria for a La Niña Advisory. Specifically, while the atmosphere is generally consistent with La Niña, the sea surface temperature in the Niño3.4 region has been volatile, recently edging up close to average following several weeks near or below the La Niña threshold (0.5°C colder than average).

Sea surface temperature anomaly animation

Animation showing sea surface temperature departure from the 1981-2010 average from early August through early October 2017. Graphic by Climate.gov; data from NOAA’s Environmental Visualization Lab.

Is the overall pattern truly La Niña, with some short-term fluctuations temporarily obscuring the pattern? Or has the atmosphere-ocean system really not settled down into a consistent pattern at all? The difference between these two scenarios is subtle, and the ENSO forecast team is maintaining the La Niña Watch as we wait for a clearer picture. The forecast is for that picture to become clearer soon, with La Niña conditions 55-65% likely during this fall and winter.

The devil’s in the details

The average wind and cloud pattern over the equatorial Pacific during September looked a fair bit like what we’d expect during La Niña, including stronger near-surface east-to-west winds and upper-level west-to-east winds over the western tropical Pacific. The pattern of greater-than-average clouds and rain over Indonesia and less over the central Pacific is also typical during La Niña. The Southern Oscillation Index and Equatorial Southern Oscillation Index were both weakly positive during September, another indicator of a stronger-than-average Walker Circulation.

Cloudiness anomaly map

Places that were more (purple) or less (orange) cloudy than the 1981-2010 average during September 2017, based on satellite observations of outgoing longwave radiation (heat). Thick clouds block heat from radiating out to space, so less radiation = more clouds, and more radiation = clearer skies. Climate.gov map from CPC data.

All those atmospheric bits sound like La Niña. But the first criteria for La Niña is a monthly average Niño3.4 index more than half a degree below the long-term average. Which we had! The September Niño3.4 average sea surface temperature anomaly (departure from long-term average) was -0.5°C. For NOAA to declare La Niña, though, we need the expectation that it will stay there for five overlapping 3-month periods.

Instead, we saw the surface temperatures warm substantially over the last half of September. The warming wasn’t enough to wipe out the whole-month cool anomaly, but it was enough to undermine—at least a little—forecasters’ confidence that the pattern is solidly established and will last for the required five overlapping seasons. So…no La Niña yet.

Diagnosing exactly why the surface temperatures warmed over a few weeks is difficult. One possibility is the tropical instability waves that have been active in the east-central tropical Pacific over the past month. These waves can mix warmer surrounding water into the cooler waters right along the equator and cause sea surface temperatures in the Niño3.4 region to rise.

It seems likely that the surface waters will tend cooler again, as those stronger-than-average surface winds I mentioned above work to cool the surface and keep the warmest Pacific waters trapped in the far western Pacific. Also, we still have a substantial amount of cooler-than-average water below the surface. The cool subsurface waters increased during September, and will likely provide a source of cooler waters to the surface over the next few months.

The dynamical computer models are not very clear on which way sea surface temperatures will go for the next month or so. As you can see here, there is a very large range of potential outcomes for October, including well above and below the La Niña threshold. However, the models are more consistent after October, predicting that the most likely outcome for the late fall and early winter is sea surface temperatures below the threshold for La Niña.

Climate model forecasts for the Niño3.4 Index

Climate model forecasts for the Niño3.4 index, from the North American Multi-Model Ensemble (NMME). Darker purple envelope shows the range of 68% of all model forecasts; lighter purple shows the range of 95% of all model forecasts. NOAA Climate.gov image from CPC data.

Usually, we wouldn’t focus that much on a short-term change in one of the physical signs we monitor. (For example,  we’ve cautioned our readers against using a single weekly anomaly to conclude that the El Niño of 2015-16 was the Most Powerful Ever.) But the sea surface temperature anomaly is essential to the ocean-atmosphere system that is ENSO. If it doesn’t return to cooler-than-average territory soon, it could leave the whole system looking more like a bunch of random trees than a forest… that is, more like random climate variability than La Niña.

If that favored La Niña develops…

Fun fact time! My blog-brother Tom has spent a lot of time studying the historical record of ENSO. He discovered that if La Niña develops this year, it will be the only La Niña on record where the Niño3.4 sea surface anomaly increased for several months, nearing the El Niño threshold, before diving into La Niña territory.  Said another way, all the other 21 La Niña events followed a steady decline from warmer-than-average or followed consistently below-average sea surface temperatures. This year would follow cooler, then warmer, then cooler again sea surface conditions.

Monthly SST comparison graph

Monthly sea surface temperature in the Niño 3.4 region of the tropical Pacific compared to the long-term average for all years when La Niña developed, showing how 2017 (purple line) compares to other events. Climate.gov graph based on ERSSTv5 temperature data.

That’s kind of interesting, but would it be significant in some way? Maybe. Or maybe Tom should get a new hobby…

Comments

I'm curious to know if the Inter-decadal Pacific Oscillation (IPO), with the approximate 30 year cycle of SST north and south of the equator are factored in. Goodwin (2005) established a link for the east coast of Australia between negative IPO and intensified La Nina events. This was evident through the negative period in the late 50's to early 70's of dramatic erosion events seemingly occurring one after another. As we move further into another negative phase, the East Coast Lows and East Coast Troughs appear to once again be intensified under La Nina conditions, though of course, it is hard to separate out the input due to general SST increases associated with climate change. Is it possible the negative IPO could be behind masking the approach of a La Nina by hiding/negating the cooler waters we would expect based on data collected over the 30 year positive IPO phase?

Hi- I'm not an expert in the topic, but I know that the IPO is strongly related to the PDO.   The PDO is, in turn, significantly related to ENSO.  Tom wrote a nice blog post here describing the PDO and what influences it:

https://www.climate.gov/news-features/blogs/enso/going-out-ice-cream-first-date-pacific-decadal-oscillation

As for which PDO state we are in now, it's  uncertain.  Time series of the PDO show that we've recently returned to a slightly cooler-than-average state (it was warmer during 2015-16), but that could be because we had a La Nina last winter and we appear to be on the cusp of a La Nina this winter as well.  

You are the best writer so full of energy and very descriptive of whats happening and why it is so strange. The one factor that did change in September was we had a very active solar flare period. Cosmic rays tracked down immediately as a result of all the geomagnetic energy coming off the sun. Cosmic rays are now trending higher again as the sun is spotless again. I expect we will go back to cooling as the sun is back in its funk at the end of solar cycle 24. So I await La Nina!

While it remains difficult to prove the link, the one thing that did change that could have a link with the warming blip was a burst of sunspots in September which have now subsided. I think there is much to learn about what drives these short term ocean temperature trends.

Add new comment

CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.