Abstract
In recent years, bioethanol from sugarcane molasses has been produced on an industrial scale in Iran. The aim of this study was to evaluate molasses-based bioethanol production from an environmental point of view. Data were collected from Debel Khazai agro-industry situated in southern region of Iran by using face-to-face interviews and annual statistics of 2010 to 2016 (6-year life cycle of sugarcane cultivation). Ten impact categories including abiotic depletion (AD), acidification (AC), eutrophication (EP), global warming potential (GWP), ozone layer depletion (OLD), human toxicity (HT), freshwater aquatic ecotoxicity (FE), marine aquatic ecotoxicity (ME), terrestrial ecotoxicity (TE), and photochemical oxidation (PO) were selected based on CML methodology. Inventory data for production of the inputs were taken from Ecoinvent, BUWAL 250, and IDMAT 2001 databases. The results revealed that in sugarcane cultivation process, electricity and trash burning were the most important contributors to all impact categories except OLD and TE. In industrial phase, natural gas had the highest contribution to the most impact categories. Greenhouse gas (GHG) emission for production of 1000 L molasses-based bioethanol was 1322.78 kg CO2 eq. By comparing total GHG emissions from 1000 L bioethanol to gasoline, the net avoided GHG emissions came out at 503.17 kg CO2 eq. According to results, it is clear that with increasing irrigation efficiency and improving performance of heating systems in industrial phase, environmental burdens would be significantly reduced.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Balat M, Balat H (2009) Recent trends in global production and utilization of bioethanol fuel, Appl. Energy 86(11):2273–2282
Beccali M, Cellura M, Iudicello M, Mistretta M (2009) Resource consumption and environmental impacts of the agrofood sector: life cycle assessment of Italian citrus based 453 products. Environ Manag 43:707–724
Boguski TK, Hunt RG, Cholakis JM, Franklin WE (1996) LCA methodology. In: Curran MA (Ed.), environmental life-cycle assessment. Library of Congress cataloging-in-publication data. pp. 15–33
Bolliger R, Bauer C (2007) Wasserkraft. Sachbilanzen von Energiesystemen (Ecoinvent report no. 6). Swiss Centre for LCI, Dübendorf and Villigen, CH
Cascone R (2008) Biobutanold—a replacement for bioethanol? CEP magazine. Am Inst Chem Eng. AIChE (august 2008)
Daylan B, Ciliz N (2016) Life cycle assessment and environmental life cycle costing analysis of lignocellulosic bioethanol as an alternative transportation fuel. Renew Energy 89:578–587
De Klein C, Novoa RSA, Ogle S, Smith KA, Rochette P, Wirth TC, McConkey BG, Mosier A, Rypdal K, Walsh M (2006) N2O emissions from managed soils, and CO2 emissions from lime and urea application. IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), Japan
EFE (2007) Biomass analysis values. Energy for environment foundation, http://www.efe.or.th
EPA-Environmental Protection Agency (1998) Emission factor documentation for AP-42 Section 1.4—natural gas combustion, Technical support division, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC. ‹http://www3.epa.gov/ttnchie1/ap42/ch01/bgdocs/b01s04.pdf ›
Faist Emmenegger M, Heck T, Jungbluth N (2007) Erdgas. Sachbilanzen von Energiesystemen (Ecoinvent report no. 6). Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Dübendorf and Villigen, CH
Gabra M (1995) Sugarcane residual fuels—a viable substitute for fossil fuels in the Tanzanian sugar industry. Renewable Energy for Development, vol 8, no 2
Greet (2010) Greenhouse gases, regulated emissions, and energy use in transportation, version 1.8d., Argonne National Laboratory. Argonne, Illinois, USA
Guinée JB, Gorrée M, Heijungs R, Huppers G, de Koning KRA, Wegener Sleewijk A (2001) Handbook on life cycle assessment. Operational guide to the ISO standards. Kluwer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands
Hamelinck C, Van Hooijdonk G, Faaij AP (2005) Ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass: techno-economic performance in short-, middle- and long term. Biomass Bioenergy 28:384–410
IEA (2005) Biofuels for transport. An international perspective. International energy agency, France, p 216
IPCC/OECD (1997) IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories
ISO 14040 (2006a) Environmental Management: life cycle assessment: principles and framework
ISO 14044 (2006b) Environmental management: life cycle assessment: requirement and guidelines
Johnson JMF, Franzluebbers AJ, Weyers SL, Reicosky DC (2007) Agricultural opportunities to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. Environ Pollut 150:107–124
Khatiwada D (2010) Assessing the sustainability of bioethanol production in Nepal. Licentiate thesis in energy technology energy and climate studies, Stockholm, Sweden
Khoshnevisan B, Rafiee S, Omid M, Mousazadeh H, Clark S (2014) Environmental impact assessment of tomato and cucumber cultivation in greenhouses using life cycle assessment and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. J Clean Prod 73:183–192
Luo L, Van der Voet E, Huppes G (2009) An energy analysis of ethanol from cellulosic feedstock—corn stover. Renew Sust Energ Rev 13:2003–2011
Macedo IC, Leal MRLV, Silva J 2004 Assessment of greenhouse gas emissions in the production and use of fuel ethanol in Brazil, São Paulo State Environment Secretariat
Morales M, Quintero J, Conejeros R, Aroca G (2015) Life cycle assessment of lignocellulosic bioethanol: environmental impacts and energy balance. Renew Sust Energ Rev 42:1349–1361
Mousazadeh H, Keyhani A, Mobli H, Bardi U, Lombardi G, El Asmar T (2009) Environmental assessment of RAMseS multipurpose electric vehicle compared to a conventional combustion engine vehicle. J Clean Prod 17:781–790
Muñoz I, Flury K, Jungbluth N, Rigarlsford G, Canals LM, King H (2013) Life cycle assessment of bio-based ethanol produced from different agricultural feedstocks. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(1):109–119
Nguyen TLT, Gheewala SH, Sagisaka M (2010) Greenhouse gas savings potential of sugar cane bio-energy systems. J Clean Prod 18:412–418
Nguyen TLT, Gheewala SH (2008) Life cycle assessment of fuel ethanol from cane molasses in Thailand. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:301. doi:10.1007/s11367-008-0011-2
Ometto AR, Hauschild MZ, Lopes Roma WN (2009) Life cycle assessment of fuel ethanol from sugarcane in Brazil. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14(3):236–247
Seabra JEA, Tao L, Chum HL, Macedo IC (2010) A techno-economic evaluation of the effects of centralized cellulosic ethanol and co-products refinery options with sugarcane mill clustering. Biomass Bioenergy 34:1065–1078
Sebastiăo D, Gonçalves MS, Marques S, Fonseca C, Gírio F, Oliveira AC, Matos CT (2016) Life cycle assessment of advanced bioethanol production from pulp and paper sludge. Bioresour Technol 208:100–109
Silalertruksa T, Gheewala TH (2009) Environmental sustainability assessment of bio-ethanol production in Thailand. Energy 34:1933–1946
Wortmann CS, Llein RN, Wilhelm WW, Shapiro C (2008) Harvesting crop residues. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska-Lincoln Extension, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources. http://www.ianrpubs.unl.edu/epublic/live/g1846/build/g1846.pdf
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to express their sincere gratitude to Debel Khazai agro-industry for the cooperation and giving the data required.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Farahani, S.S., Asoodar, M.A. Life cycle environmental impacts of bioethanol production from sugarcane molasses in Iran. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24, 22547–22556 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9909-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9909-1