|
|
The GIA’s Forays into Diamond Tracking
Jun 29, 2017 4:25 AM
By Avi Krawitz
|
|
|
RAPAPORT... What business does a gemological laboratory have telling stories about diamonds? That was the unspoken question Matt Crimmin had to answer in his presentations at JCK Las Vegas earlier this month.
As vice president of lab operations for the Gemological Institute of America (GIA), Crimmin used the show to roll out what his team had effectively been working on since 2010: a solution to some of the core challenges facing the trade, particularly that of raising consumer confidence.
Speaking with Rapaport News recently, Crimmin (pictured below) outlined two projects that the grading nonprofit is piloting with precisely that goal in mind. These initiatives, which the GIA says could change the way diamonds are sold and monitored, are making the laboratory an unlikely frontrunner not only in diamond-grading, but in the drive to keep better track of diamonds and to tell their stories.
Adopting RFID Technology
In the first of those projects, the GIA is using Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) technology to help manufacturers manage their inventory, including the use of a smart-card grading report to make it easier to access a diamond’s information.
Under the program, the lab provides participating manufacturers with RFID tags to attach to the diamonds’ parcel paper before they send the stones for grading. The technology has integrated light-emitting diodes (LEDs), so the diamonds’ RFID tags light up when accessed, making it simpler for the manufacturer to locate a given stone among thousands. This method of communicating with inventory offers the user “significant operational time saving,” explains Crimmin.
Having started in late 2014 with five manufacturers on board, the GIA is now working with approximately 30 companies on the program and has opened it for others to join.
The RFID system comes in handy when dealing with large volumes of diamonds, as it is more than 10 times faster than the conventional barcode-scanning method, Crimmin said. It’s also less prone to error, since the tag is readable even if the parcel is not in the reader’s line of sight.
Additionally, manufacturers can distribute the tags to their clients so that monitoring can continue further along the pipeline. The GIA ultimately envisions implementing the program for all diamonds that pass through its grading system, which could potentially result in a single database for everyone’s inventory.
Considering the number of downstream transactions that take place among manufacturers, middle-market players, and retailers, Crimmin believes the trade would benefit from involving RFID tags in every stage of the supply chain.
“We anticipate the true advantages of the program will be accomplished at an industry-wide scale,” he says.
Tracing from Mine to Market
The second of the two pilot projects is the mines-to-market (M2M) program that the GIA presented in Las Vegas. GIA scientists have developed the ability to link a polished diamond with the original rough by assessing the stone at various stages of production. Among other things, this opens up strong marketing opportunities for jewelry retailers who want to differentiate themselves, according to Crimmin.
For the pilot, the GIA is working with Russian miner Alrosa, which provides the lab with rough for evaluation before it goes onto the market. The GIA is also in talks with Petra Diamonds, Trans Hex and Botswana’s Okavango Diamond Company about having them joining the initiative.
When it receives the rough from Alrosa, the GIA creates a file — or “digital fingerprint” — for each diamond. The GIA then returns the stones to Alrosa, which supplies them to its manufacturer clients. The manufacturers participating in the program need to keep a record of the diamonds through the cutting process so they can reference the polished coming from those pieces of rough when the stones eventually go to the GIA for grading, Crimmin explains.
“If we evaluate the rough diamond and then the polished that came from that piece of rough, we can confirm a linkage between the two,” he says.
The GIA also needs to ensure that the rough is untouched before it does the evaluation, so it can guarantee the validity of the source. That authenticity is what lets retailers leverage the diamonds’ story further along the supply chain when selling to consumers.
Telling the Story
With that in mind, the GIA has created a consumer-focused mobile application that uses these digital fingerprints to tell the story of the diamond’s journey through the pipeline.
When the jeweler shares a diamond with the consumer on the app, it brings up not only the GIA grading report, but also the provenance of the piece. Scrolling through the app sections, users can find customized information about the mine where the stone was recovered, details on where it was cut and polished, generic explanations about the formation and discovery of diamonds, and — most importantly, according to Crimmin — the retailer’s back story and services.
The app also allows consumers to upload their own videos and pictures relating to the diamond, showing, for example, the gift-giving moment or the relationship that the stone represents. Retailers can even package the information in a hard-bound book for the buyer.
The GIA is relying on retailers to use the app to push the storytelling concept. After all, Crimmin says, they have the most to gain from doing so, since they’re the ones that need to do the work selling.
“Too often, the jeweler forgets to tell the story,” he remarks. “There’s a need to tell the story, and this [app] is designed to make the consumer a hero.”
But it also requires a coordinated effort across the pipeline, since the traceability component needs the participation of miners, manufacturers and jewelers. The GIA believes it is well-positioned to coordinate that effort.
“This fits well with our overall mission to protect the consumer trust in gems and jewelry,” says Crimmin. “It not only gives confidence about the origin of the diamond, but it gives consumers a better experience in buying the jewelry, and hopefully gives them confidence to keep coming back to buy more.”
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tags:
Alrosa, Avi Krawitz, Botswana, diamonds, Gemological Institute of America, GIA, JCK Las Vegas, M2M, Matt Crimmin, Mine to Market, Okavango, Petra Diamonds, Rapaport, RFID
|
|
|
|
|
|
Origin tracking
|
|
Jun 29, 2017 10:32PM
By James Sinclair
|
I feel this is unnecessary for several reasons. But first, I am a retailer with extensive diamond knowledge and experience. I have a successful, modern diamond/bridal business. I make use of the latest technology, so I am not a Luddite. I use social media, and I believe that I keep up with trends. I have young, switched-on staff, well-trained and savvy. Some have come from the fashion industry and as such are in touch with the customer base we sell to, which is highly educated, professional or business owners.
The average diamond sale is US$10,000.00 — many higher, some lower, but all are GIA, Triple Excellent, Premium Ideal Cut. These customers ask for the best, expect the best and are prepared to pay for the best. They use the internet for information, which they are only too ready to use against us, until we gain their confidence.
To find these diamonds on regular diamond lists, or to select them from the vast numbers of 3X on RapNet, takes time. One search recently started with 371 possible diamonds, but when my criteria were applied, we had 3 to choose from. To take all this time to find the best diamonds, only to be told, I don’t wish to buy Russian, Canadian (sorry, Canada, but some people may object, even to Canadian origin), etc., etc., or diamonds polished in India, costs too much in time and effort. And to what end? That diamonds from some countries are unacceptable! I thought the Kimberley Process weeded out undesirable countries.
This will cause division, not harmony. This will cost money, cause heartache and give the client another reason to doubt the integrity of the diamond industry. Already, this industry is unfairly accused of practices that are acceptable in other larger, more politically aware industries. Please stop with these ideas that at the end of the day will actually make it harder to sell diamonds. Please stop trying to justify technology that does very little in adding value to a diamond, just for technology’s sake. GIA should concentrate on improving the information in their certificates, making them more relevant to the modern diamond buyer and enforcing stricter adherence to their own grading criteria.
Regards,
James Sinclair
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|