Development of a financially viable model for the management of mandibular fractures as day cases in a level 1 major trauma centre
Introduction
Inpatient beds are the most valuable resource in the NHS,1 and admissions for the management of mandibular fractures account for a considerable number of inpatient bed-days.2 A proportion of these are patients who are waiting on a clinically-prioritised emergency operating list and then recovering as inpatients. The complexity and duration of these operations varies depending on factors such as the severity of the fracture, the presence of infection, and coexisting conditions.
There is already a system for rapid access to the day-care unit operating theatres, which relies on assessment of the patient followed by booking from the emergency department. This has been adopted for other surgical specialties (general surgery and gynaecology) for management of minor acute conditions when we anticipate a short operation, and discharge the same day.
In this paper we present evidence in favour of the adoption of a rapid-access, day-care service for outpatient management of an identified group of patients with mandibular fractures. Such patients must be medically and socially suitable for day care, with the duration of operation being less than one session, and the postoperative recovery period short enough to permit discharge the same day before 8 pm.
We hope that, through the adoption of primary scoring of the severity of the injury and medical and social screening, a group of patients can be identified who can safely be sent home from the emergency department with an appointment booked for operation in the day-care unit. This will reduce our use of inpatient beds while maintaining good clinical practice. We know of no reports that have suggested that patients with mandibular fractures are being managed as outpatients elsewhere in the UK, or that it results in poorer clinical outcome.
Section snippets
Aims
We first wanted to identify a group of patients whose duration of operation and recovery period were suitable for the management of mandibular fractures by outpatient day surgery.
We also wanted to evaluate the potential financial benefits of outpatient management of mandibular fractures that resulted from the reduced use of both inpatient beds and the main operating theatre.
Methods
Non-consecutive adults who were admitted with isolated mandibular fractures over a 12-month period were included in the study. These patients followed the traditional path of assessment and admission from the emergency department to an inpatient ward, fasting until an emergency (NCEPOD classification) theatre slot became available, being operated on, and recovering postoperatively on the ward.
These patients were then assessed for their theoretical suitability for parallel management as
Results
Forty complete proformas were returned and these comprised the study group. There were 32 men and eight women, mean (range) age 30 (17-46) years. Thirty-one of them would have been suitable for admission to the day-care unit based on their ASA grade and domestic arrangements. Of the nine who would not have been suitable, six had nobody to take them home or stay with them overnight, and three were ASA grade II or more.
The mean (range) delay from injury to treatment was 3 (0-14) days and each of
Discussion
The patterns of mandibular fracture and demographics are broadly in line with what has been published elsewhere.6, 7 Most of the identified group would fit the medical/social criteria for management in the day-care unit, which probably reflects the fact that patients were relatively young with minimal coexisting conditions. Most exclusions were for domestic reasons, with lack of a carer or difficulties with transport being the most common. Such social issues could be addressed given notice as
Conclusions
We plan to implement this model in our hospital and to audit its effectiveness. We think that savings will be made in cost/bed-day, and the opportunity for potential earnings is predicted to increase by the adoption of a day/ambulatory care model for management of mandibular fractures. No clinically deleterious consequences have been identified as a result of this proposed change of practice, and we hope that this paper will provide some guidance and ideas for the design of similar outpatient
Conflict of interest
We have no conflicts of interest.
Ethics statement/Confirmation of patients’ permission
Ethics statement not required. There is no identifying information about patients given.
References (14)
- et al.
European Maxillofacial Trauma (EURMAT) project: a multicentre and prospective study
J Craniomaxillofac Surg
(2015) - et al.
The mandible injury severity score: development and validity
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2007) - et al.
Comparison of treatment outcomes associated with early versus late treatment of mandible fractures: a retrospective chart review and analysis
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2010) - et al.
Pattern of mandibular fractures in an urban major trauma center
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2003) - et al.
A systematic review of prophylactic antibiotics in the surgical treatment of maxillofacial fractures
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2006) - et al.
Postoperative radiographs after maxillofacial trauma: Sense or nonsense?
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2011) - et al.
An audit of the effectiveness of postoperative radiographs—do they make a difference?
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2004)
Cited by (7)
How London maxillofacial units faced the demands of COVID lockdown and lessons learnt
2022, Advances in Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryVariation in UK Deanery publication rates in the British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: where are the current 'hot spots'?
2021, British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryCitation Excerpt :Publications for the Defence Postgraduate Medical Deanery were grouped in the location of their associated training unit. Eighty-four issues of BJOMS published between January 2011 and December 2019, spanning volumes 49-59, were included9–384. These represented 378 full-length articles published by UK-based units.
Is the Mandible Injury Severity Score a Valid Measure of Mandibular Injury Severity?
2019, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryCitation Excerpt :Swanson et al9 studied the application of the MISS in a cohort of pediatric (<18 yr old) patients treated for mandibular fractures and found that complications (unerupted teeth, facial asymmetry, hyperplasia, restricted movement, malocclusion, temporomandibular joint dysfunction, exposure of hardware, dystonia, gingival recession, and periodontal bone loss) were meaningfully associated with an increasing MISS. To date, the MISS has been used in several studies to control for fracture severity in treatment-specific outcomes research, develop a model for identifying patients suitable for outpatient management of mandibular fractures, and correlate fracture severity with alcohol use and interpersonal violence.13-16 Currently, most studies attempt to classify fracture severity by using multiple variables (eg, open or closed, tooth in the line of fracture, number of fractures, displacement).
Retrospective analysis of postoperative interventions in mandibular fractures: a shift towards outpatient day surgery care
2018, British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryCitation Excerpt :We found that discharge on the day of operation would have been appropriate for 161 (93%) patients. This is greater than that reported by Haq et al11 who found 26/40 patients were suitable for discharge about five hours after the procedure. One potential concern with moving to a policy of day surgery, is that depending on the availability of elective operating time, it is possible that a shift to elective rather than emergency theatre lists may sometimes lengthen the time from presentation to treatment.
Emergency versus semi-elective management of mandible fractures: a Maxillofacial Trainee Research Collaborative (MTReC) study
2023, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of EnglandTrauma clinic follow-up: Predictors of nonattendance and patient-reported reasons for no show
2023, Trauma (United Kingdom)