U.S. Auto Sales Brand-By-Brand Results: February 2017 YTD

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

Auto sales declined by a modest 1 percent in the United States in February 2017, dragged down by plunging sales at numerous Fiat Chrysler Automobiles brands and sharp declines at Toyota Motor Corp. and Hyundai-Kia. Ford Motor Company sales slid 4 percent because of a 26-percent decline in car sales at the Ford division.

Across much of the industry, there were signs of rude health, particularly if the car sector is ignored. Of the 20 most popular cars in America — a group topped by the Toyota Camry — 16 nameplates generated fewer sales this February than last. Yet America’s five leading utility vehicles (Rogue, CR-V, RAV4, Escape, Equinox) combined for more than 25,000 additional February sales in 2017. And while minivan sales plunged by a fifth, U.S. pickup truck sales were up 10 percent because of full-size truck strength.

These stark contradictions produced a market that produced slightly degraded numbers in one of the two traditionally weakest months on the calendar. Now one-sixth of the way into 2017, the poor selling season should be behind us.

Mercedes-Benz led all premium auto brands in February 2017. Lexus, typically a top contender for luxury leadership, posted a harsh decline for a second consecutive month following a December surge.

Mitsubishi was the fastest-growing mainstream brand, rising 39 percent year-over-year. Infiniti, Audi, GMC, and Volkswagen all reported double-digit percentage increases, along with niche brands like Maserati, Jaguar, Bentley, and Alfa Romeo, which sold 412 Giulias.

On the flip side, Chrysler, Mini, and Lexus all reported declines of more than 20 percent.

America’s largest-volume automaker, meanwhile, rose 4 percent. GM sales improved thanks to meaningful gains at Chevrolet and GMC, despite drops at Buick and Cadillac.

Auto BrandFebuary 2017February 2016% Change2017 YTD2016 YTD% ChangeAcura 10,86412,773-14.9%20,06623,023-12.8%Alfa Romeo44347 843%551115379%Audi 13,74111,71817.3%26,94223,56814.3%BMW 22,55822,4980.3%40,66740,5800.2%Buick 16,13117,811-9.4%29,24836,080-18.9%Cadillac 10,82311,840-8.6%21,12122,580-6.5%Chevrolet 164,095158,6443.4%299,265296,4471.0%Chrysler 16,73023,279 -28.1%30,10745,051-33.2%Dodge 43,87846,985-6.6%83,98795,287 -11.9%Fiat 2,1452,651 -19.1%4,3095,030-14.3%Ford 198,720208,006-4.5%361,121373,307-3.3%Genesis 1,582——3,400——GMC 46,33939,53017.2%83,66376,4639.4%Honda 110,822106,2124.3%208,000196,4595.9%Hyundai 51,438 53,009 -3.0%96,12798,020-1.9%Infiniti 13,73710,37132.5%25,29518,88533.9%Jaguar 3,4841,512130%6,4232,864124%Jeep 62,34573,063 -14.7%120,760135,830-11.1%Kia 42,67349,737-14.2%78,29988,042-11.1%Land Rover 5,7476,417 -10.4%11,91012,072-1.3%Lexus 18,33823,090-20.6%33,91044,023-23.0%Lincoln 8,7448,0398.8%17,52915,21615.2%Maserati 1,08772849.3%1,9761,25357.7%Mazda 22,82421,5445.9%44,52241,2487.9%Mercedes-Benz °24,522 22,941 6.9% 50,049 47,605 5.1% Mercedes-Benz Vans °2,513 2,269 10.8% 4,562 4,168 9.5% Total Mercedes-Benz °27,03525,2107.2% 54,611 51,7735.5%Mini 2,1542,839-24.1%5,2646,077-13.4%Mitsubishi 10,9247,870 38.8%17,38114,13423.0%Nissan 122,003120,5401.2%222,764217,7602.3%Porsche 3,6373,561 2.1%8,2397,9154.1%Ram 42,78541,293 3.6%80,83077,3574.5%Smart 348422-17.5%672821-18.1%Subaru 45,50042,0118.3%89,37983,1127.5%Toyota †156,001164,864-5.4%283,477305,214-7.1%Volkswagen 25,14522,32112.7%48,65542,40014.8%Volvo 4,6515,260-11.6%8,1239,504-14.5%————— ——BMW-Mini 24,71225,337-2.5%45,93146,657-1.6%Fiat Chrysler Automobiles 168,326187,318 -10.1%320,544358,670-10.6%DaimlerAG27,38325,6326.8%55,28352,5945.1%Ford Motor Co.207,464216,045-4.0%378,560388,523-2.6%General Motors 237,388227,8254.2%433,297431,5700.4%Honda Motor Co.121,686118,9852.3%228,066 219,48223.9%Hyundai-Kia 95,693102,746-6.9%177,826186,062-4.4%Jaguar-Land Rover 9,2317,92916.4%18,333 14,93622.7%Nissan Motor Co./Mitsubishi146,664138,7815.7%265,440250,7795.8%Toyota Motor Corp.174,339187,954-7.2%317,387 349,237-9.1%Volkswagen Group * 42,67837,66213.3%84,139 74,02613.7%———————Industry Total †1,333,128 1,348,401 -1.1% 2,475,700 2,512,864 -1.5%

Source: Manufacturers

* Volkswagen Group includes sales figures for Audi, Bentley, Porsche, and Volkswagen brands

° Mercedes-Benz USA releases sales figures for the Mercedes-Benz brand in the conventional sense, vans excluded, as well as totals for the Metris and Sprinter vans. The complete picture is included here.

† Toyota’s sales figures include those of Toyota’s discontinued Scion brand.

** Industry total takes into account Automotive News figures/estimates for brands such as Tesla (3,000 February units) and other low-volume, high-priced manufacturers.

Timothy Cain is the founder of GoodCarBadCar.net, which obsesses over the free and frequent publication of U.S. and Canadian auto sales figures.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 50 comments
  • Seanx37 Seanx37 on Mar 01, 2017

    Is there somewhere with a more detailed breakdown? I would love to know sales by model.

    • See 1 previous
    • Brettc Brettc on Mar 02, 2017

      Check out Tim's site, goodcarbadcar.net. Lots of data there.

  • Cdnsfan27 Cdnsfan27 on Mar 02, 2017

    Jaguar up 130% and nipping at Porches heels, yay!

  • MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.
  • MaintenanceCosts I don't have an opinion on whether any one plant unionizing is the right answer, but the employees sure need to have the right to organize. Unions or the credible threat of unionization are the only thing, history has proven, that can keep employers honest. Without it, we've seen over and over, the employers have complete power over the workers and feel free to exploit the workers however they see fit. (And don't tell me "oh, the workers can just leave" - in an oligopolistic industry, working conditions quickly converge, and there's not another employer right around the corner.)
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh [h3]Wake me up when it is a 1989 635Csi with a M88/3[/h3]
  • BrandX "I can charge using the 240V outlets, sure, but it’s slow."No it's not. That's what all home chargers use - 240V.
  • Jalop1991 does the odometer represent itself in an analog fashion? Will the numbers roll slowly and stop wherever, or do they just blink to the next number like any old boring modern car?
Next