The paphiopedilum groups...

Slippertalk Orchid Forum

Help Support Slippertalk Orchid Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

The Orchid Boy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2012
Messages
1,752
Reaction score
0
Location
Nebraska
Ok I know of some paphiopedilum groups like maudiae, parvisapalum, cochlopetalum, and I can think of one more, the group Paph. bellatullum is in (can't think of the name). Are there any more groups? What clasifies if a paph goes into a particular group? I've been curious about this for a long time but didn't find a real answer...
 
Try to get your hands on a book like Harold Koopowitz's Tropical Slipper Orchids. I think it goes through moat of that info. I haven't read it in a while, I think I will get it out.
 
The groups you refer to are considered either subgenera or sections of genus Paphiopedilum, depending on whose classification system you look at. I think the following names would be recognizable to most Paph growers, though not accepted by all taxonomists (some example species follow each name):

Cochlopetalum (sequential flowering species like primulinum and glaucophyllum)

Brachypetalum (bellatulum, niveum, concolor, etc.)

Parvisepalum (delenatii, malipoense,armeniacum, etc.)

Coryopedilum (multifloral species like rothschildianum, sanderianum, philippinense, etc.)

Pardalopetalum (the other multifloral group, like haynaldianum, lowii, parishii)

Barbata (or Sigmatopetalum) (Though 'Maudiae-type' is a purely horticultural designation it basically falls within Barbata, species like callosum, sukhakulii, appletonianum)

Paphiopedilum (the bulldog or 'complex' hybrids come mostly from these species, like gratrixianum, charlesworthii, fairrieanum, hirsutissimum)

Classification traditionally depended on examination of physical characteristics and using those characteristics to separate the 'groups'. Increasingly genetic analysis is used to clarify the relationships. Either way it should reflect the actual evolutionary relationships. You really do need to look at some comprehensive references to learn the technical distinctions, but you can come to recognize them with a little practice without knowing the technicalities. Slipperorchids.info has a good survey of various taxonomic systems with full lists of species, and the Internet Orchids Species Photo Encyclopedia has very good photos for visual comparisons and some botanical details.
 
I would also add insigne (consist of species like gratrixianum, villosum, barbigerum, helenae, etc)
 
I find it helps to visualize the distinct groups by showing the bloom photos side by side. Using Braem's 6 subgenera classification, you get the following:

Subgenus Parvisepalum:
overviewparvisepalum.jpg


Subgenus Brachypetalum:
overviewbrachypetalum.jpg


Subgenus Paphiopedilum:
overviewpaphiopedilum.jpg


Subgenus Sigmatopetalum (a.k.a. barbata types, Maudiae types):
overviewsigmatopetalum.jpg


Subgenus Polyantha (simultaneous multiflorals [i.e. all buds in bloom at the same time]):
overviewpolyantha.jpg


Subgenus Cochlopetalum (sequential multiflorals [i.e. new blooms open as old blooms fade]):
overviewcochlopetalum.jpg


You can further narrow down each of the above groups using flower and plant morphology. That can get pretty complicated, though, depending on how specific you want to be. If you like being very specific, there's more information located here:
http://www.slipperorchids.info/taxonomy/index.html

This was a nice neat classification system until Paph. canhii was discovered. It seems to be intermediate between Parvisepalum and Sigmatopetalum. However, morphological and molecular evidence points to Parvisepalum and Sigmatopetalum being the most distantly related subgenera among the Paphiopedilums. Where exactly Paph. canhii belongs is, as far as I have heard, still up in the air, with no molecular analysis yet performed. Subgenus Megastaminodium was created for it, but I have not seen a good explanation of how this new subgenus relates to the others.

--Stephen
 
Thanks Stephen

For adding to the confusion, some texts will still have polyantha split between the coryopedilums and the pardopetalums (as Kirk noted above). So as The Orchid Boy goes through various texts he'll know that Polyantha is synonamous with the multi floral groups listed as cory and pardopetalum.

And I think Megastaminodium is Braem's new baby, so I wouldn't expect to see any molecular/DNA data to justify it in your presented dvisions (based on Braem).
 
Back
Top