Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to key eventsSkip to navigation

David Davis announces final Brexit deal will take form of act of parliament – as it happened

This article is more than 6 years old

Rolling coverage of the day’s political developments as they happen, including David Davis’s Commons statement on Brexit

 Updated 
Mon 13 Nov 2017 13.34 ESTFirst published on Mon 13 Nov 2017 04.17 EST
David Davis in the House of Commons announcing that the final Brexit deal will be implemented via an act of parliament.
David Davis in the House of Commons announcing that the final Brexit deal will be implemented via an act of parliament. Photograph: PA
David Davis in the House of Commons announcing that the final Brexit deal will be implemented via an act of parliament. Photograph: PA

Live feed

Key events

Afternoon summary

  • David Davis has promised that British MPs and peers will be able to scrutinise, amend and vote on the final Brexit agreement through primary legislation in a concession to pro-EU Conservative backbenchers. Although this did not come as a complete surprise - Number 10 hinted it was planning this move two weeks ago, and ministers were under pressure to concede because otherwise they were facing a likely defeat on this matter during the EU withdrawal bill’s committee stage - it nevertheless amounts to a potentially significant announcement. Pro-Brexit MPs did not seem especially happy about what Davis had to say, and the Labour party said it was a “significant climbdown”. (See 4.56pm.) In theory this means that the House of Commons, which probably contains a decisive “soft Brexit majority”, could start rewriting the Brexit transition and withdrawal deal if, as planned, it is agreed next autumn. But in the Commons Davis admitted that his promise to implement the withdrawal deal through an act of parliament would only take effect if a deal actually gets agreed. If there is no deal, there won’t be a bill. And, as Davis admitted in the Commons, even if the Commons does vote to change the withdrawal deal, there is no guarantee that Brussels will agree to its proposals. When Labour’s Clive Efford asked Davis what would happen if the Commons amends the legislation to demand a different sort of withdrawal, Davis replied:

If he House does that [votes to change the bill], that will be taken I guess by the government as an instruction to go back and speak for them [to Brussels]. Whether that will deliver any outcome, I don’t know.

In private government sources are even blunter, suggesting that there is very little chance of amendments to the bill passed by the Commons leading to the EU agreeing to change the terms of a Brexit deal already negotiated by the government.

That’s all from me for today.

Thanks for the comments.

Lisa O'Carroll
Lisa O'Carroll

The Irish government had said the Democratic Unionist Party will not decide the future of Northern Ireland in Brexit negotiations.

Foreign minister Simon Coveney told reporters in Brussels on Monday that its future is far too important to be left to any one party.

“We respect the views of the DUP, but we respect the views of other parties in Northern Ireland. No one party should have the only say,” he said after a meeting of EU foreign ministers.

That is not how a decision as fundamental and as important to Ireland’s future and Britain’s future should be made.

I don’t accept that the options should be limited on the basis of the political arithmetic in the House of Commons.

Illuminating the potential for the Irish question to turn into a Brexit roadblock, Coveney said that those who thought the Irish border question could simply be pushed into the second phase of Brexit talks were mistaken.

“Some people hoped that Ireland and the EU task force would simply allow this issue to drift into phase two in the hope that it would be resolved through some form of trade agreement or trade partnership agreement in the future,” he said. He added that this was “not a viable proposal”.

The EU has indicated that short of a fresh solution from the British government, it sees the best way to achieve an invisible border in Ireland was for Northern Ireland to stay in the Customs Union and the single market, something the DUP has said it will oppose.

This was seen in some quarters as a bid by the EU give Northern Ireland “Hong Kong style” autonomy.

Brexit secretary David Davis rejected this on Friday saying the government would not accept anything that would undermine the constitutional integrity of Northern Ireland.

Coveney said he did not believe reports at the weekend that British officials were “horrified” by this proposal. He said:

Anybody whose been following this process knows that Ireland has been consistent and stubborn and strong on the border issue because it’s so important to the functioning of the island of Ireland; linked to a peace process, linked to normal commerce, and the movement of goods, services, livestock, people.

This is from the BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg.

Next few hours going to be really interesting ... Davis' concession has taken wind out of rebels' sails, but not clear yet if they will stand down

— Laura Kuenssberg (@bbclaurak) November 13, 2017

This is from Jakub Krupa, who works for the Polish Press Agency in London.

Deputy DG of Poland's Lewiatan Business Confederation Grzegorz Baczewski tells me after this morning's No10 visit that two-year transition period "would not have been enough even if we had the rest of deal already done now", adds "the UK should be more specific" to boost talks

— Jakub Krupa (@JakubKrupa) November 13, 2017
Anushka Asthana
Anushka Asthana

Dominic Grieve expressed concern that ministers were making a verbal promise alone for a Brexit deal bill - and he said the policy needed to be written into the EU withdrawal bill. He told the Guardian:

I welcome the announcement today that parliament will be asked to approve any withdrawal agreement by statute but it remains the case that the bill as drafted does not reflect what the government is now promising - and the bill will therefore have to be changed to meet the government’s promise.

I hope that my amendment won’t be necessary but it will remain there to be debated and if necessary voted on.

Dominic Grieve. Photograph: Amer Ghazzal/REX/Shutterstock

According to Sky’s Faisal Islam, Dominic Grieve is not withdrawing his amendment yet.

Understand that Grieve not withdrawing his amendment... Govt will not say if they are accepting his... pic.twitter.com/SO9DsI69C7

— Faisal Islam (@faisalislam) November 13, 2017

In the Commons earlier David Davis refused to commit the government to accepting it. See 4.52pm.

John Bercow, the speaker, has granted an emergency debate on the Paradise Papers tomorrow. That means the debate on the EU withdrawal bill will start, and finish, later than planned.

Suella Fernandes, the Conservative chair of the European Research Group, which is pushing for a hard Brexit, asks Davis to confirm that MPs will not be able to use the newly-announced bill to reverse Brexit.

Davis agrees. It will be a meaningful vote, but not one that can undo Brexit, he says.

Davis says, if MPs reject any aspect of the Brexit deal bill, that will be taken by the government as an instruction to go back to Brussels and try again. But whether they take any notice is a matter for them, he says.

The Labour MP Mike Gapes says, if MPs vote down the proposed Brexit deal bill, the UK will leave the EU anyway without a deal. That means MPs are not getting a real choice, he says. It does not amount to parliament “taking back control”.

Davis does not accept this.

Share
Updated at 

Comments (…)

Sign in or create your Guardian account to join the discussion

Most viewed

Most viewed