A Western-backed deal to salvage Libya is falling apart
The latest peace accord has merely reconfigured the conflict, not solved it
WHEN Fayez al-Serraj returned to Libya in March the situation looked unusually hopeful. For two years, rival governments in the east and west of the country had fought over a disputed election. In December representatives from both sides of the country (but not their leaders) agreed to a UN-backed peace proposal. Powerful players in the war withheld their support, but they could be brought in later, said advocates. The deal, known as the Skhirat agreement after the Moroccan town in which it was signed, empowered Mr Serraj (pictured), then a relatively unknown politician, to form a government of national accord (GNA). His smooth arrival in Tripoli, the capital, in March seemed to herald a brighter future.
It has not turned out that way. The new government, though ostensibly backed by some powerful militias, has failed to gain broad support. The eastern parliament, called the House of Representatives (HOR), has refused to approve the body, as required under the Skhirat agreement. Remnants of the old government and legislature in the west, known as the General National Council (GNC), unsuccessfully attempted a coup in Tripoli last month.
This article appeared in the Middle East & Africa section of the print edition under the headline "The unravelling"
More from Middle East & Africa
The Middle East has a militia problem
More than a quarter of the region’s 400m people live in states dominated by armed groups
How much do Palestinians pay to get out of Gaza?
Middlemen are profiting from Gazans’ desperation
Why Iranian dissidents love Cyrus, an ancient Persian king
The British Museum is sending one of Iran’s adored antiquities to Israel