Re: Launch assessment
Any reason you want to sit down with him or just wait till Robby gets back?
JP
--Sent from my iPad--
john.podesta@gmail.com
For scheduling: eryn.sepp@gmail.com
> On Apr 2, 2014, at 10:39 PM, Cheryl Mills <cheryl.mills@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Robby is in Australia
>
> cdm
>
>> On Apr 2, 2014, at 10:09 PM, John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Robby,
>> I met with Eric Schmidt tonight. As David reported, he's ready to fund, advise recruit talent, etc. He was more deferential on structure than I expected. Wasn't pushing to run through one of his existing firms. Clearly wants to be head outside advisor, but didn't seem like he wanted to push others out. Clearly wants to get going. He's still in DC tomorrow and would like to meet with you if you are in DC in the afternoon. I think it's worth doing. You around? If you are, and want to meet with him, maybe the four of us can get on the phone iN the am.
>> JP
>>
>> JP
>> --Sent from my iPad--
>> john.podesta@gmail.com
>> For scheduling: eryn.sepp@gmail.com
>>
>>> On Apr 1, 2014, at 7:19 PM, Robert Mook <robbymook@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Would appreciate thoughts on this.
>>> I was frankly surprised yesterday by her openness to starting a PAC, etc. For that reason, my recommendation here is to open an exploratory committee--it has advantages over a PAC and I think they're the same in the eyes of the media.
>>> I assumed for all scenarios that nothing happens before the midterms elections are over.
>>> Feedback welcome!
>>> <Launch Options 4-1.docx>
Download raw source
Return-Path: <john.podesta@gmail.com>
Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-108-45-53-96.washdc.fios.verizon.net. [108.45.53.96])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id n7sm9079802qav.31.2014.04.03.02.32.37
for <cheryl.mills@gmail.com>
(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Thu, 03 Apr 2014 02:32:37 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Launch assessment
References: <CA+NiFyMJ+tJUZDAp2Uqcf-u9pnT1hzK25mGg+aUjviUQ7KgqSg@mail.gmail.com> <E645FADC-5D76-4AD2-A3E5-E5D360274BF7@gmail.com> <6AF95EB6-44C3-44C5-B594-E4BFFF5F2B34@gmail.com>
From: John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (11B554a)
In-Reply-To: <6AF95EB6-44C3-44C5-B594-E4BFFF5F2B34@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <06BBA6B6-C9BB-43B9-BBEF-09C8F0DA0D13@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 05:32:37 -0400
To: Cheryl Mills <cheryl.mills@gmail.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Any reason you want to sit down with him or just wait till Robby gets back?=
JP
--Sent from my iPad--
john.podesta@gmail.com
For scheduling: eryn.sepp@gmail.com
> On Apr 2, 2014, at 10:39 PM, Cheryl Mills <cheryl.mills@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
> Robby is in Australia=20
>=20
> cdm
>=20
>> On Apr 2, 2014, at 10:09 PM, John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.com> wrote:=
>>=20
>> Robby,
>> I met with Eric Schmidt tonight. As David reported, he's ready to fund, a=
dvise recruit talent, etc. He was more deferential on structure than I expec=
ted. Wasn't pushing to run through one of his existing firms. Clearly wants t=
o be head outside advisor, but didn't seem like he wanted to push others out=
. Clearly wants to get going. He's still in DC tomorrow and would like to me=
et with you if you are in DC in the afternoon. I think it's worth doing. You=
around? If you are, and want to meet with him, maybe the four of us can ge=
t on the phone iN the am.
>> JP
>>=20
>> JP
>> --Sent from my iPad--
>> john.podesta@gmail.com
>> For scheduling: eryn.sepp@gmail.com
>>=20
>>> On Apr 1, 2014, at 7:19 PM, Robert Mook <robbymook@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>=20
>>> Would appreciate thoughts on this. =20
>>> I was frankly surprised yesterday by her openness to starting a PAC, etc=
. For that reason, my recommendation here is to open an exploratory committ=
ee--it has advantages over a PAC and I think they're the same in the eyes of=
the media.
>>> I assumed for all scenarios that nothing happens before the midterms ele=
ctions are over.
>>> Feedback welcome!
>>> <Launch Options 4-1.docx>