Bing's Translator Accidentally Confuses ISIS and Saudi Arabia

We may earn a commission from links on this page.

Bing, Microsoft’s version of Google, just learned the hard way that fucking up your translation service is a bad way to win friends on the internet.

According to a report in the Guardian, the search engine’s translator thought the word “Daesh”—the Arabic word for the Islamic State—meant “Saudi Arabia” in English.

Advertisement

The error was pointed out by people on Twitter:

Advertisement
Advertisement

The company was quick to respond. Mamdouh Najjar, a vice president for Microsoft who works within Saudi Arabia, told the Huffington Post Arabia that the mistake may have been due to the crowdsourced nature of the translator—when it receives a suggestion from 1,000 people, he said, the service may opt to go with that translation.

“Our product team fixed the error in the automated translation within hours of learning about it,” a spokesperson for Microsoft later told the Register.

Advertisement

Just last week, Bing’s map service screwed up when it positioned Melbourne, Australia in the wrong hemisphere. A program manager noted on Twitter that the mistake was due to...Wikipedia.

Advertisement

In an earlier email to Gizmodo, a Microsoft spokesperson further explained that Wikipedia data, among other data sources, “is used to provide rich descriptions for some results on the Bing Maps website. These descriptions are then linked to our location data for positioning them on the map.”

Of course, Bing isn’t the only service to use crowdsourced data. Google users can add and edit places on the Maps platform, and in 2014, Google briefly showed the Wikipedia page for Ebola above the Center for Disease Control’s information, the New York Times reported. And Bing’s translator certainly isn’t the only translation service to spit out erroneous results—Google translated “Russian federation” into “Mordor” in January. (A spokesperson blamed the mistake on “automatic translation.”)

Advertisement

Still, there’s no getting around the fact that relying on crowdsourced data can be a tricky proposition. Then again, at least it wasn’t dick pranksters this time.

[The Guardian]

Advertisement