Similar articles for PMID: 29166348

Year	Number of Results
2000	1
2002	1
2003	1
2006	2
2008	1
2010	1
2011	2
2012	5
2013	4
2014	4
2015	5
2016	3
2017	15
2018	21
2019	26
2020	8
2022	1
2024	0

1

The Economics of Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.

Glasberg SB. Glasberg SB. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Dec;140(6S Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction):49S-52S. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004051. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017. PMID: 29166348 Review.

2

Options in Acellular Dermal Matrix-Device Assembly.

Sigalove S. Sigalove S. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Dec;140(6S Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction):39S-42S. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004049. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017. PMID: 29166346 Review.

3

An Algorithmic Approach to Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Version 2.0.

Antony AK, Robinson EC. Antony AK, et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 May;143(5):1311-1319. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005519. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019. PMID: 31033812 Review.

4

One-Step Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction With Dermal Matrix-Covered Implant Compared to Submuscular Implantation: Functional and Cost Evaluation.

Cattelani L, Polotto S, Arcuri MF, Pedrazzi G, Linguadoca C, Bonati E. Cattelani L, et al. Clin Breast Cancer. 2018 Aug;18(4):e703-e711. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2017.11.015. Epub 2017 Dec 2. Clin Breast Cancer. 2018. PMID: 29275104

5

Important Considerations for Performing Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.

Sbitany H. Sbitany H. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Dec;140(6S Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction):7S-13S. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004045. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017. PMID: 29166342 Review.

6

Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Safe Alternative to Submuscular Prosthetic Reconstruction following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.

Sbitany H, Piper M, Lentz R. Sbitany H, et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Sep;140(3):432-443. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003627. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017. PMID: 28574950

7

Reducing Expansion Visits in Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of Prepectoral and Subpectoral Expander Placement.

Wormer BA, Valmadrid AC, Ganesh Kumar N, Al Kassis S, Rankin TM, Kaoutzanis C, Higdon KK. Wormer BA, et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Aug;144(2):276-286. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005791. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019. PMID: 31348326

8

Early Functional Outcomes After Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Case-Matched Cohort Study.

Schaeffer CV, Dassoulas KR, Thuman J, Campbell CA. Schaeffer CV, et al. Ann Plast Surg. 2019 Jun;82(6S Suppl 5):S399-S403. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001669. Ann Plast Surg. 2019. PMID: 30570559

9

Evaluation of Prepectoral Implant Placement and Complete Coverage with TiLoop Bra Mesh for Breast Reconstruction: A Prospective Study on Long-Term and Patient-Reported BREAST-Q Outcomes.

Casella D, Di Taranto G, Marcasciano M, Sordi S, Kothari A, Kovacs T, Lo Torto F, Cigna E, Calabrese C, Ribuffo D. Casella D, et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Jan;143(1):1e-9e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005078. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019. PMID: 30303929

10

A Prospective Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes of Subpectoral and Prepectoral Strattice-Based Immediate Breast Reconstruction.

Baker BG, Irri R, MacCallum V, Chattopadhyay R, Murphy J, Harvey JR. Baker BG, et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 May;141(5):1077-1084. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004270. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018. PMID: 29697602

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

My NCBI Filters

Results by year

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Publication date

93 results

Results by year