Advertisement

PunditFact: Can oil firms lease federal land for less than the price of a Big Mac?

 
Published Feb. 20, 2015

Doubts that Washington is getting as much money as it should when it leases land to oil and gas companies go back 40 years. The decades have done little to ease those concerns.

In 2013, the Government Accountability Office reported that in the year before, oil and gas companies took in revenues of $66 billion and paid $10 billion to the government. Onshore leases in particular have not kept pace with the times, according to the GAO.

The conservation group Center for Western Priorities took up this banner with an intriguing comparison on its website.

"Oil companies can obtain an acre of public land for less than the price of a Big Mac," the center wrote.

The going price for a Big Mac, without the fries and the drink, is $3.99. We decided to check whether you can lease an acre of federal land for less than that.

Greg Zimmerman, the policy director at the Center for Western Priorities, sent us a link to a September 2014 sales report from the Nevada office of the Bureau of Land Management. The numbers back up Zimmerman's claim.

Texas-based Appaloosa Energy paid $6,426 for the rights to drill on 3,212 acres. Buena Vista Holdings out of Colorado paid $11,392 for the rights to 5,693 acres.

That comes out to barely more than $2 per acre, and even the mathematically challenged can see that is about half the price of a Big Mac. Under BLM regulations, $2 per acre is the minimum possible bid.

Just to be clear, the company pays this money each year for the right to pump oil or gas from the land over a 10-year period. It doesn't actually own the land, but it has locked down the oil and gas rights.

Zimmerman acknowledges that there is another wrinkle here. There's an additional $1.50-per-acre fee for the first five years. Zimmerman described it as the cost to hold the land while the company assesses what to do with it. A BLM spokesman told PunditFact that the bidder would pay $1.50 per year for the first five years and then $2 a year for the next five.

"Nevertheless, even if you add the $1.50 per acre rent to the $2-per-acre bid, it would still be less than a Big Mac," Zimmerman said.

If the land ever starts producing oil or gas, the company starts paying royalties to the government on top of the $2-per-acre leasing fee.

It's important to note that the statement simply said oil companies can obtain an acre for very little money. It doesn't say this happens a lot. When we ran the numbers for all of 2014, we found that the average price per acre nationwide was $220. That was for parcels leased through a competitive auction. If a parcel finds no takers through competitive bidding, the government can offer it noncompetitively.

Catch up on top stories before rush hour

Become a Times subscriber to get our afternoon newsletter, The Rundown

We’ll break down Tampa Bay’s biggest environment, politics, business, education and culture news every weekday.

You’re all signed up!

Want more of our free, weekly newsletters in your inbox? Let’s get started.

Explore all your options

One time, that led to a winning bid of about $1.50 per acre.

From what we could find, the lowest lease prices were all in Nevada. Brad Posey is a managing director for Appaloosa Energy, a company that successfully secured the right to a few thousand acres at a cost of $2 each. Posey said the property comes with many hurdles before any wells can be drilled.

"That land has so many restrictions on it," Posey said. "There are the prairie chickens, and habitat. A very limited portion can be explored on."

Posey is correct about the land. A proposed resource management plan for the entire area puts a number of conditions on development. It protects municipal water supplies, grazing areas and trails for off-road trail riding. And animals.

"These areas contain some of the most important habitat remaining for sage-grouse and other at-risk wildlife," the plan said.

Posey called the venture "pure wildcat speculation." This raises the question, if it's such a long shot, why is the land worth even $2 an acre?

Because, as another Appaloosa managing director, Martin Shields, explained, sometimes an unpromising bit of land surprises you.

"Many years ago, I was with a company that paid the $2 minimum and it paid off," Shields said.

We asked Zimmerman if he knew of any land that went for $2 an acre that ever produced oil or gas. Zimmerman said he did not know of any case when it did.

We rate the claim Mostly True.

Read more rulings at PunditFact.com.