Issue: November 2011
November 01, 2011
2 min read
Save

Public restrooms contained too many bacteria to count

Issue: November 2011
You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

BOSTON — High-touch areas of public restrooms — particularly areas people touched after washing their hands — frequently contained more than 1,000 colony-forming units per milliliter of infection-causing bacteria, according to findings presented here.

Lennox Archibald, MD, PhD, of the College of Medicine at the University of Florida in Gainesville, spoke to Infectious Disease News at the IDSA 49th Annual Meeting. “The six or seven bugs that we found were the ones that cause two-thirds of infections in health care centers,” he said.

Archibald
Lennox Archibald, MD, PhD

The researchers aimed to fill a void in qualitative or quantitative data about bacterial contamination of surfaces likely to be touched after washing and drying hands in public restrooms. Public restroom areas included those in malls, hospitals, offices, lecture halls, conference centers, department stores, restaurants, airports and resorts.

Of the multitude of organisms recovered, the predominant gram-positive organisms recovered included Staphylococcus, Micrococcus, Bacillus and Enterococcus. Gram-negative microorganisms were mostly Enterobacteriaceae (eg, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella, Cronobacter, Leclercia, Pantoea and Serratia) or non-fermenters, according to the results.

All high-touch surfaces yielded extensive quantitative cultures. The quantity of organisms was too numerous to count in several of the restrooms. The research included a process of counting up to 1,000 colony-forming units (CFU)/milliliter. Archibald said the standard measure for “too numerous to count” is usually 250 CFU/mL.

The areas most likely to contain microorganisms that were too numerous to count included faucets, soap and paper dispenser operating levers, and the exit door handle of restaurants and aircraft restrooms.

“It is especially important to note that this was in areas people touched after they washed their hands,” he said.

This was the first phase of a three-phase study. “The first phase, which we are looking at here, was simply a microbiologic characterization,” Archibald said. “The second phase included observation of hand washing practices, including the time taken to wash and dry hands, and the third phase included information on more than 200 bathrooms representing 40 different kinds of sites. These data are forthcoming.”

The trial was conducted from December to February. The researchers cultured 18 public restrooms and four commercial aircraft.

Disclosure: Dr. Archibald reports no relevant financial disclosures.

For more information:

  • Archibald L. #314. Presented at: IDSA 49th Annual Meeting; Oct. 20-23, 2011; Boston.

PERSPECTIVE

Keith S. Kaye, MD, MPH
Keith S. Kaye, MD, MPH

These findings are not surprising, but are notable. Several of the pathogens identified are known colonizers of the gastrointestinal tract, skin or nares. What is notable is that items such as faucets and doorknobs were contaminated — thus, even after washing your hands in the bathroom, there is a high likelihood that they can become immediately contaminated. The role of ‘hands free’ faucets, soap and towel dispensers, and doors that can be operated by feet or open automatically seem to be particularly relevant in health care and food care arenas.

– Keith S. Kaye, MD, MPH

Infectious Disease News Editorial Board member

Disclosure: Dr. Kaye reports no relevant financial disclosures.

Twitter Follow InfectiousDiseaseNews.com on Twitter.