Proving that even a winning formula can turn sour in the wrong hands, Scourge Outbreak attempts to fill the Gears of War void and fails in most instants.
Scourge: Outbreak debuted on Xbox 360 a decade ago and is still playable on modern consoles, but is it worth your time?
Cubed3:
"Imitation is the best form of flattery, but only when done right, and Scourge: Outbreak fails at doing so. It tries so hard to look similar to triple-A series giants like Gears of War, Crysis, and Mass Effect, but the resemblance is superficial at best. There's not a single aspect left unflawed, yet the worst thing about this game is how extremely average it is. Furthermore, this is actually supposed to be a vastly superior, upgraded version of The Scourge Project, a statement that raises the inevitable question of just how much worse was the original, and is this PS3 version any better than the terrible PC iteration?"
Each week Sony brings PlayStation 4, PlayStation 3, PlayStation Vita and PlayStation Portable owners new content, add-ons, games and more. PlayStation LifeStyle catalogs the PlayStation Store updates for the major regions across the globe. Check back every Tuesday and Wednesday to keep up to date with each week’s PlayStation Store Update
Already got too many other games to play through to even think about buying some more.
that was a biased review. Why did you not mention the ability to use powers due to ambrosia rather than repeatedly talking only negatives of the game? I agree that it reminds me of Gears and even mass effect due to myself watching gameplay video and saw one of the weapons that were available. You didn't even talk about what sort of weapons were available. How many you can have. Whether you can melee or execute enemies? How is damage/health is established? What are you going to do when Dyson files a lawsuit against you for copying their ability to suck harder than they can?