40°

Massive reveals The Division will not have an exact year for when it takes place

When you look at a game like The Division you can't help but wonder when exactly this game is taking place, is it the near future, hundreds of years from now or some other time, and Massive has revealed we will continue to not know when The Division takes place.

Read Full Story >>
examiner.com
redwin3679d ago

What??? Well, better get it right before the look gets too old and we loose interest. Why do they announce games this early? I rather they announce it just before a demo comes out. If it comes out in two years from now, I can promise I will loose interest and ill desiderata to buy something that'll look more modern. So, they better get this right quick.

medman3679d ago

No exact year....I'm more interested in when we'll get an exact release date for this game.

Codewow3679d ago

I'll just say it's in the year 2525 ;)

80°

Exclusive Q&A: “Tom Clancy’s: The Division: Hunted” Author Thomas Parrott

from paulsemel.com: In this exclusive Q&A, the author of the new technothriller based on "Tom Clancy's: The Division" discusses how it ties to the games while also bringing its own story to a close.

Read Full Story >>
paulsemel.com
rpad82d ago

did you edit out the parts where the author repeated everything you asked?

50°

Ubisoft's The Division series just had 80% slashed off its price on Steam

If you're looking to try out an exciting, team-based shoot 'em up, The Division is currently on sale on Steam!

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
170°

Stop Forcing Multiplayer Into Single Player Games

TIM WHITE WRITES: "Multiplayer or single player? Developers, you can do both, just not willy-nilly."

Read Full Story >>
growngaming.com
Flawlessmic389d ago

I am in absolute agreement with the OP 👌

shinoff2183388d ago

I hate when I see single player games and see people begging for multi-player. Jeez guys it don't need to be on every game. Latest one I seen was atomic heart.

-Foxtrot388d ago

Multiplayer or even co-op

If it was always a single player game then that's how it is

Inverno388d ago

It's a trend that never really went away. For me multiplayer in a primarily SP focused game was an excuse for DLC. Then there's the mentality gamers had that adding multiplayer makes a game worth the price, otherwise it should be half price for half a game. A way of thinking devs reassured when they started adding multiplayer to their sequels. We see the same with multiplayer focused games getting SP in their sequels.

Flawlessmic388d ago

Tbh multilayer now is a way to add live service and mtx elements, very rarely does it come of well.

What single players game used to be in a lot of cases now require 3 other people for keeping to really enjoy it and I hate having to rely on others to get the maximum from a game.

Sp should be sp, if devs want to add a separate multi mode then that's fine with me, the legends addition to ghost of tshushima was fricking sick but totally separate to the main game. Sick of co op too.

Hofstaderman387d ago

I remember when certain single player games had them as included optional modes that was played on the couch. Had brilliant times with Syphon Filter and Golden Eye. Me and my bro used to used to fight over who would play as Gabe even though it was technically just a skin. Good times.

Dagexon387d ago

I didn't notice your comment before I added mine.
But good times indeed

Show all comments (15)