Please Sign In and use this article's on page print button to print this article.

McDonald's sues Baltimore-based landlord to stop Dunkin' Donuts from occupying a strip mall

By Rebecca Cooper
 –  Digital Editor, Washington Business Journal

Anyone who patronizes both McDonald's and Dunkin' Donuts stores has surely noticed that the former coffee offerings are starting to look a lot like those at the latter — and that New England favorite's menu, in turn, now boasts a lot more than just Boston cremes and munchkins.

McDonald's evidently has noticed as well, and has filed a suit to protect its turf at a shopping center in Montgomery County.

The fast-food chain is accusing its landlord, Baltimore-based Red Mill Shopping Center Associates LLC, of breach of contract for agreeing to lease another space in the shopping center to a Dunkin' Donuts.

The shopping center's owner could not be reached for comment, and an attorney for McDonald's did not return a call seeking comment.

McDonald's lease for the space at the Red Mill Shopping Center, on 7220 Muncaster Mill Road in Derwood, stipulates that the restaurant be free from competition within 2,000 feet from restaurants "serving menu items substantially similar to the items on Tenant's menu," according to the suit, filed Feb. 14 in U.S. District Court in Montgomery County.

The suit cited almost two dozen such menu items, including Dunkin's angus steak big n' toasted (compare to the steak-and-egg McMuffin), Dunkin's bacon ranch chicken sandwich (compare to McDonald's bacon cheddar McChicken), chicken wraps, coffee drinks and Dunkin's coolatas, frozen coffee and other drinks that are compared to McDonald's frappes.

The combination Dunkin' Donuts-and-Baskin Robbins shop also would overlap with McDonald's ice cream offerings, the suit stated.

McDonald's estimates it will lose more than $75,000 in revenue because of Dunkin Donuts' presence, according to the suit.

"McDonald's will continue to accrue damages on a daily basis for as long as the Dunkin' Donuts continues to operate at the shopping center in violation of the restrictive covenant in the McDonald's lease," the suit stated.

McDonald's has asked the court to rule that leasing to Dunkin' would violate its own lease with the landlord, and to rule that the shopping center cannot lease to Dunkin' Donuts.