Background: There is growing evidence from case-control and from cohort studies that smoking is inversely related to the risk of developing Parkinson's disease (PD). However, it is still controversial if PD starts at an older age in ever-smoking patients compared to never-smoking ones.
Patients and methods: The present retrospective study compares in a large series of 512 out-patients, collected over the last 24 years, the age of onset of the complaints, the age at which PD was diagnosed and the start of levodopa treatment between ever- and never-smokers. Also, the occurrence of long-term side-effects of the drug was evaluated. 184 PD patients with a history of smoking were compared with 328 who had never smoked. The subgroups with and without a family history of PD were analysed separately.
Results: In the overall ever-smoking group, as well as in the subgroup without a family history, the onset of the disease and the time of the diagnosis of PD and the time at which levodopa was started occurred at an older age than in the never-smoking group. This difference could not be demonstrated in the patients with a family history, due to the low number of cases and the lack of statistical power. Although the follow-up period was the same in both study groups, motor fluctuations and dyskinesia were more frequent and appeared earlier after levodopa treatment in the non-smoking compared to the ever-smoking PD patients. Only for cognitive impairment there was a non-significant trend in the smoking group.
Conclusion: The present study confirms the protective action of smoking on PD and also suggests some modulating effect of smoking on the dopaminergic system.