Ayes to the left
The battle for Scotland will be decided by a group of people who rarely get to change anything
IT IS not yet midday, and the Tolbooth pub has filled with the boisterous green-and-white-clad supporters of Celtic, the football team of Glasgow’s working-class Catholics. But an argument opposite the bar concerns the constitution, not the match. Cathy declares that if Scotland left the United Kingdom it would remain in the EU. Thomas, sipping a neon-orange concoction of Irn Bru and vodka, shakes his head forcefully: “No, we’d have to reapply.” They have one important thing in common, though. Neither has yet decided whether to vote for or against Scottish independence.
On September 18th all Scots over the age of 15 will be offered that choice in a referendum. The pro-union Better Together campaign is reliably ahead in the opinion polls. With a strong hand in any secession negotiations, the unionists have foxed the pro-independence Yes Scotland camp with erudite questions about tricky details. The latest came in a speech by Mark Carney in Edinburgh on January 29th. Though he stressed his non-partisan, “technocratic” role, the governor of the Bank of England warned that for Scotland to share the pound it would need to accept “some ceding of national sovereignty”. On such high-level fronts, the unionists are winning the war.
This article appeared in the Britain section of the print edition under the headline "Ayes to the left"
More from Britain
Why so many Britons have taken to stand-up paddleboarding
It combines fitness, wellness and smugness
Why Britain’s membership of the ECHR has become a political issue
And why leaving would be a mistake
The ECtHR’s Swiss climate ruling: overreach or appropriate?
A ruling on behalf of pensioners does not mean the court has gone rogue