Abstract
This chapter will attempt to demonstrate that the structure of the creativity process is the same in the artistic and scientific cultures, even if the two cultures are intrinsically different. The differences are clear: the practitioners of the scientific culture aim at acquiring impersonal and objective knowledge that will withstand the scrutiny by others, while the practitioners of the artistic culture aim at generating personal, subjective knowledge that does not need verification. Science makes progress, art changes, but does not make progress: the scientific theories of the early Greeks are now little more than historical curiosities, whereas Praxiteles’ sculptures have the same value and importance today as they had more than 2000 years ago. Science is right or wrong, art cannot be right or wrong. On this accepted background, this chapter will work to show that both cultures, different as they may be, nevertheless have the same aim. They try to understand reality and to make sense of it. The statement is not obvious: by traditional consensus, the search for truth and the generation of beauty have been considered the distinctive goals of the two cultures: Samuel Taylor Coleridge [1] summed up the concept in his incisive prose nearly 200 years ago:
The proper and immediate object of science is the acquirement, or communication of truth: the proper and immediate object of poetry is the communication of immediate pleasure.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
S.T. Coleridge: Definition of poetry (1811). In: The Literary Remains of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, collected and edited by H.N. Coleridge, vol. II (William Pickering, London 1856)
P. Klee: Das Bildnerische Denken. Schriften zur Form und Gestaltungslehre, Vol. 1 (Benno Schwabe Verlag, Basel und Stuttgart 1956)
J. Monod: Symmetry and Function of Biological Systems at theMolecular Level. Nobel Symposium, A. Engström and B. Sandberg (eds.) (Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockholm 1968) 15–27
P. Mitchell: Chemiosmotic Coupling in Oxidative and Photosynthetic Phosphorylation (Glynn Research Ltd., Bodmin 1966)
G.H. Hardy: A Mathematician’s Apology (Cambridge University Press, London 1940)
P.A.M. Dirac: The Evolution of the Physicist’s Picture of Nature. Sci. American 208, 45–53, 1963
E. Schroedinger: An undulatory theory of the mechanics of atoms and molecules. Phys. Rev. 28, 1049–107 (1926)
Plato: Phaedrus and Hippias Major. In: Dialogues (Appleton and Co., New York 1898)
D. Hume: Of the Standard of Taste. In: Four Dissertations (A. Millar, London 1757)
I. Kant: Kritik der Urteilskraft (Lagarde und Friedrich, Berlin und Libau 1790)
H. Weyl: Symmetry (Princeton University Press, Princeton 1983)
D. Frey: Studium Generale 2, 268–278 (1949)
E.H. Gombrich: Symmetrie, Wahrnehmung und künstlerische Gestaltung. In R. Wille (ed): Symmetrie in Geistes-und Naturwissenschaft (Springer, Berlin 1988) 94–119
R. Arnheim: A Review of Proportion. In: G. Kepes (ed): Module, Proportion, Symmetry and Rhythm (Georg Brazilier, New York 1966) 218–230
A. Pape-Moller: Evolution, 49, 658–670 (1994)
C. Di Dio, E. Macaluso, and G. Rizolatti: PloS One, 11, 1201–1208 (2007)
T. Jacobsen, R.I. Schuboth, L. Hoepel and Y.V. Cramon: Neuroimage 29, 276–285 (2006)
R. Lambert: John Constable and the Theory of Landscape Painting (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2005)
P. Cézanne, Letter to Emile Bernard, 1904
G. Schatz: Jenseits der Gene (Verlag Neue Zürcher Zeitung, Zürich 2008)
E. Montale: Ossi di Seppia (Rivoluzione Liberale, Torino 1925)
F.G. Lorca: Imagination, Inspiration, Evasion. Lecture at the Ateneo of Granada 1928
F.A. Kekulé: Benzolfest Berichte der deutschen chemischen Gesellschaft 23, 1302–1311 (1890)
G. Leopardi: La Sera del Dì di Festa. In: Canti (Le Monnier, Firenze 1835)
V. Sereni: La Strada di Creva. In: Frontiera (Edizioni di Corrente, Milano 1941)
C.P. Snow: The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution (Cambridge University Press, London 1959)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Italia
About this paper
Cite this paper
Carafoli, E. (2009). Scientific and Artistic Creativity: In Search of Unifying Analogies. In: Carafoli, E., Danieli, G.A., Longo, G.O. (eds) The Two Cultures: Shared Problems. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-0869-4_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-0869-4_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Milano
Print ISBN: 978-88-470-0868-7
Online ISBN: 978-88-470-0869-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)