Finance & economics | Big banks

Chop chop

Why haven’t banking giants got a lot smaller?

BOSSES at big banks would once have cringed at releasing the kind of results they have been serving up to investors in recent days. This week, for instance, Deutsche Bank posted a loss of €6.8 billion ($7.4 billion) for 2015. In the third quarter of last year the average return on equity at the biggest banks, those with more than $1 trillion in assets, was a wan 7.9%—far below the returns of 15-20% they were earning before the financial crisis. Exclude Chinese banks from the list, and the figure drops to a miserable 5.7%. Returns have been languishing at that level for several years.

In response, the banks’ top brass are following a similar template: retreats from certain countries or business lines, along with a stiff dose of job cuts. Barclays, which earlier this month said it would eliminate 1,000 jobs at its investment bank and close its share-trading business in Asia, is typical. More radical measures, such as breaking up their firms into smaller, more focused and less heavily regulated units, do not seem to be on the cards.

This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline "Chop chop"

The brawl begins

From the January 30th 2016 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Finance & economics

Immigration is surging, with big economic consequences

The West faces an unprecedented number of new arrivals

Japan will struggle to rescue its plummeting currency

Expensive government intervention looks likely to provide only brief respite