Chop chop
Why haven’t banking giants got a lot smaller?
BOSSES at big banks would once have cringed at releasing the kind of results they have been serving up to investors in recent days. This week, for instance, Deutsche Bank posted a loss of €6.8 billion ($7.4 billion) for 2015. In the third quarter of last year the average return on equity at the biggest banks, those with more than $1 trillion in assets, was a wan 7.9%—far below the returns of 15-20% they were earning before the financial crisis. Exclude Chinese banks from the list, and the figure drops to a miserable 5.7%. Returns have been languishing at that level for several years.
In response, the banks’ top brass are following a similar template: retreats from certain countries or business lines, along with a stiff dose of job cuts. Barclays, which earlier this month said it would eliminate 1,000 jobs at its investment bank and close its share-trading business in Asia, is typical. More radical measures, such as breaking up their firms into smaller, more focused and less heavily regulated units, do not seem to be on the cards.
This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline "Chop chop"
More from Finance & economics
Immigration is surging, with big economic consequences
The West faces an unprecedented number of new arrivals
Japan will struggle to rescue its plummeting currency
Expensive government intervention looks likely to provide only brief respite
The UAE is using a wealth fund to gain diplomatic sway
And to build holiday resorts