The short answer to this question is no, but the real story is a bit more complex. Although Chilean sea bass does not meet legal standards for listing as an endangered species, the health of the fishery for this popular food fish is questionable. As a result, many organizations that promote sustainable fishing suggest that people avoid eating this fish in favor of favor of other white fish like halibut, Atlantic herring, barramundi, or Pacific halibut.
Before embarking on a discussion of how endangered this fish really is, it may help to know what a Chilean sea bass is, since this fish is not a bass or a native of Chile. Its scientific name is Dissostichus eleginoides, and the more proper common name is toothfish or Patagonian toothfish. The fish prefer the deep waters of the South Pacific, and while they can be found off the coast of Chile, they were at one point widely distributed in other parts of the ocean as well.
Several things put this species at risk from overfishing. They are very slow to mature, and they tend to group together while spawning, making them easy prey for fishing trawlers. Studies on the fish have shown a steady decline in population, indicating that their popularity as a food fish has put a great deal of pressure on the population. The publicization of the plight of the fish has ironically also driven up the rate of illegal poaching, which pressures the species even more since poached fish is not regulated or counted in national quotas.
Most regulatory agencies classify Chilean sea bass as “overfished,” which means that it is not officially endangered, but it might be heading that way. Some people have suggested that this fish has become a political issue, and that it is not listed as a legally threatened species due to pressure from the fishing industry. This accusation is hard to prove, as it is clear that studies on the fish and regulation of its population have been very difficult to perform, making it hard to legally list the fish as threatened.
Consumers are asked to consider alternate choices because it is difficult to determine whether or not an individual fish has been legally harvested. By reducing overall demand, activists hope to reduce the appeal of poaching, which would reduce pressure on these fish and allow them to recover. Many prominent restaurateurs have joined forces to champion the cause of the Chilean sea bass, and to alert consumers to fishery conservation issues in general.
US consumers who want to make more informed choices about their fish might want to look up the website of the Marine Stewardship Council. This group certifies fish that are harvested in a sustainable and healthy way. More information about food choices can be found at Seafood Watch, an organization run by the Monterey Bay Aquarium. Seafood Watch also has a useful pocket-sized chart of fish choices that can be taken to restaurants and grocery stores.
By Mary McMahon
Ever since she began contributing to the site several years ago, Mary has embraced the exciting challenge of being a All Things Nature researcher and writer. Mary has a liberal arts degree from Goddard College and spends her free time reading, cooking, and exploring the great outdoors.