FYFD
Celebrating the physics of all that flows. Ask a question, submit a post idea or send an email. You can also follow FYFD on Twitter and YouTube. FYFD is written by Nicole Sharp, PhD.
If you're a fan of FYFD and would like to help support the site and its outreach, please consider becoming a patron on Patreon or giving a donation through PayPal with the button below. Your support is much appreciated!
In December 1995, the Galileo probe made its dramatic descent into Jupiter’s atmosphere at a velocity of more than 47 km/s. In 30 seconds, it decelerated from Mach 50 to Mach 1, undergoing incredible heating as it did so. Anytime an object moves through a fluid faster than the local speed of sound, it creates a leading shock wave that compresses the fluid, heats it, and redirects it around the object. The faster the speed, the hotter the fluid will be after passing through the shock wave.
Above about five times the speed of sound, the heating effect is so strong that it’s able to rip molecules apart, creating a chemically reactive mixture that will ablate away material from the object. For this reason, Galileo and other planetary entry vehicles carry heat shields made to sacrifice themselves while protecting the cargo and (in some cases) crew onboard. Data from Galileo showed that, although the heat shield survived the brunt of its descent, it experienced worse conditions than expected. Near the heat shield’s shoulder, almost all of its material ablated away.
Scientists continue to study Galileo’s descent even now, using it to test and inform their models of the flow and chemistry that occurs at these hypersonic speeds. The better we can understand and predict these flows, the better our designs will become. Mass that’s currently spent on overly-conservative heat shields can instead go toward additional instruments or supplies. (Image credit: Chop Shop Studio; research credit: L. Santos Fernandes et al.; via AIP)
During the recent Perseid shower, photographer Petr Horálek caught an awesome timelapse of an exploding meteor and the vortex ring it created. This is a type of persistent train left when meteors pass through the upper atmosphere. The exact physics are not well understood because such events are difficult to observe; catching them at all is basically just happenstance. But one interpretation is that we’re seeing trails of plasma left by the ionization of parts of the meteor. When the meteor hits the upper atmosphere, there’s an extremely strong hypersonic shock wave. The jump in temperature across that shock wave is enough to pull atoms apart, creating a plasma. The train left by this meteor’s demise was faintly visible even an hour after the fireball. (Image credit: P. Horálek, video version; via APOD; submitted by Andrea S.)
In 2013, a meteor about 20-meters in diameter broke up over Chelyabinsk, Russia in a dramatic display that damaged buildings within 100 km and injured more than 1200 people. To better understand the threat presented by such objects, NASA has been conducting 3D, hypersonic simulations like the one shown here. The meteor material is shown in gray and black. Brighter colors like red and yellow indicate the hot, high-pressure shock wave caused when the meteor slams into the atmosphere. Aerodynamic effects quickly erode the meteor, ripping it into pieces that disperse energy explosively in the atmosphere. While you might think the meteor breaking up is good for us, it’s actually the blast waves from its break-up that cause the most damage. (Image and video credit: NASA, source; via Gizmodo)
Earlier this month, an international team launched a successful hypersonic flight test in Australia. The Hypersonic International Research Experimentation (HIFiRE) Flight 5b was launched atop a two-stage rocket and reached its maximum speed of Mach 7.5, well above Mach 5, which defines the start of the hypersonic regime. The purpose of this particular flight test was not to test new propulsion technologies - there was no scramjet engine on this flight. Instead, researchers wanted to study aerodynamics at high Mach number, specifically the behavior of the air very close to the vehicle, its boundary layer.
The payload being tested was an elliptical cone mounted on the front of the vehicle and shown in images above. The shape of the payload is such that flow will curve around the cone rather than following straight lines. The image on the lower right contains black streamlines that show how air twists around the cone. This complex flowfield complicates the physics of the boundary layer near the cone’s surface and increases the likelihood that the boundary layer will transition from laminar flow to turbulent flow, thereby increasing heating on the payload. Ideally, the data from the test flight will let engineers test their ability to understand and predict this boundary layer transition in the future. For more on boundary layer transition and its effects at hypersonic speeds, check out my latest FYFD video. (Image credit: Australia Department of Defense, R. Kimmel et al., F. Li et al.; topic requested by Guido)
Atmospheric re-entry subjects vehicles to extreme conditions. At high Mach numbers, the leading shock wave compresses the air so strongly that it reaches temperatures hotter than the surface of the sun. At these temperatures, oxygen and nitrogen molecules in the air dissociate, bathing a vehicle in a plasma of ionized gas molecules. Often these atoms chemically react with the surface materials of a vehicle causing ablation that removes mass from the vehicle while helping protect the vehicle substructure from re-entry heating. Tests in specialized ground facilities like arc-jet plasma tunnels are necessary to develop thermal protection systems capable of shielding a vehicle during hypersonic flight. (Image credit: D. Ponseggi/NASA)
I often receive questions about how fluids react to extremely hard and fast impacts. Some people wonder if there’s a regime where a fluid like water will react like a solid. In reality, nature works the opposite way. Striking a solid hard enough and fast enough makes it behave like a fluid. The video above shows a simulated impact of a 500-km asteroid in the Pacific Ocean. (Be sure to watch with captions on.) The impact rips 10 km off the crust of the Earth and sends a hypersonic shock wave of destruction around the entire Earth. There’s a strong resemblance in the asteroid impact to droplet impacts and splashes. Much of this has to do with the energy of impact. The asteroid’s kinetic (and, indeed, potential) energy prior to impact is enormous, and conservation of energy means that energy has to go somewhere. It’s that energy that vaporizes the oceans and fluidizes part of the Earth’s surface. That kinetic energy rips the orderly structure of solids apart and turns it effectively into a granular fluid. (Video credit: Discovery Channel; via J. Hertzberg)
In February 2013 a meteor streaked across the Russian sky and burst in midair near Chelyabinsk. A recent Physics Today article summarizes what scientists have pieced together about the meteor, from its origins to its demise. The whole article is well worth reading. Here’s a peek:
The Chelyabinsk asteroid first felt the presence of Earth’s atmosphere when it was thousands of kilometers above the Pacific Ocean. For the next dozen minutes, the 10 000-ton rock fell swiftly, silently, and unseen, passing at a shallow angle through the rarefied exosphere where the molecular mean free path is much greater than the 20-m diameter of the rock. Collisions with molecules did nothing to slow the gravitational acceleration as it descended over China and Kazakhstan. When it crossed over the border into Russia at 3:20:20 UT and was 100 km above the ground, 99.99997% of the atmosphere was still beneath it.
Because the asteroid was moving much faster than air molecules could get out of its way, the molecules began to pile up into a compressed layer of high-temperature plasma pushing a shock wave forward. Atmospheric density increases exponentially with depth, so as the asteroid plunged, the plasma layer thickened and its optical opacity rapidly increased. About one second later, at 95 km above the surface, it became bright enough to be seen from the ground. That was the first warning that something big was about to happen. #
How often are scientific articles that gripping?! Kring and Boslough provide some excellent descriptions of the aerodynamics of the meteor and its airburst. Be sure to check it out. (Photo credit: M. Ahmetvaleev; paper credit: D. Kring and M. Boslough; via io9)