60°

5 Reasons Why I Prefer Battlefield to Call of Duty

IM PLAYIN discuss why they prefer Battlefield to Call of Duty.

Read Full Story >>
implayin.co.uk
PudgeyBurrito3396d ago (Edited 3396d ago )

Well Said. I also made the leap from COD to Battlefield at the beginning of this console generation and have not even thought of looking back. When I play Ghosts or AW it feels like a toy for some reason now. Not going to say I hate the games. They just don't feel as quality as Battlefield IMO.

Note: I lived through the BF4 issues and rubber banding. Those technical glitches don't ruin the game for me as these days they are few and far between. It was a bit annoying in the past but again wasn't a deal breaker.

thorstein3395d ago

I don't see why I can't enjoy and play both? Is there some sort of gamebreaking glitch that prevents me from playing more than one FPS on a console?

I started with BF BC 2. At that time there were some decent COD games out and I didn't overlook them.

Then Medal of Honor came out and it was a solid experience. The sequel didn't live up to the 1st. But it reminded me that there can be some great gameplay with the right devs.

MikEyG3395d ago

This is off topic but who in the hell came up with that avatar,seriously???. Colonel Sander's being replaced with Snake...Lmao.

The_Sage3395d ago

Lol. That is hilarious!

nowitzki20043395d ago

I started with BF2 on PS2 and have been a HUGE BF fan since. 12 vs 12 with big maps back then, vehicles and all.

Remy_S3395d ago (Edited 3395d ago )

Because it doesn't feel like I'm stuck in a small cage with 360 no scopes around every corner.

Lilrizky3395d ago

I converted to BF series as my favourite when BF3 came out.

MW3 was a big disappointment and BF3 was my first 'true' battlefield with jets, big maps and conquest. Loved it!

BF4 was also way better than ghosts

BF4 is just as good as BF3 too.

annoyedgamer3395d ago

Bf4 was as good as Bf3? You sure?

Lilrizky3395d ago

Despite technical issues, maps and gun to gun gameplay is just as good

Majin-vegeta3395d ago

Cuz you can mess around and still make it a fun game.

Case in point.
http://youtu.be/nteDP62uWcw

Monster_Tard3395d ago

Me too, although I didn't really get into BF4, the damage out put is too high imo.

Show all comments (16)
150°

Call Of Duty Advanced Warfare 2 Was In Development Before Being Canned For WWII

Former director at Activision, Bret Robbins, revealed that Advanced Warfare 2 had a working prototype, but it was eventually shelved for COD WWII.

Read Full Story >>
dualshockers.com
chicken_in_the_corn388d ago

That is a shame. AW is my favourite CoD. I hope they do a sequel one day.

LordoftheCritics387d ago

Thoroughly enjoyed AW.

Good campaign and everything.

LOGICWINS387d ago

Same. Fantastic campaign, but I wasn't crazy about the jetpacks in multiplayer.

RaidenBlack387d ago

I still prefer CoD based on historical settings or in near future settings(like CoD: Ghost) ... even though I liked infinite Warfare's campaign ... it was top notch

CobraKai387d ago

I felt it was a good time to revisit WW2

porkChop387d ago

I actually really enjoyed WWII. I never understood the hate it got.

JEECE387d ago

A lot of people who never played a shooter prior to like 2012 get really mad about anything that isn't a modern combat game.

Show all comments (10)
50°

Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare Weapons That Should Return in a Sequel

Game Rant Writes "With rumors swirling about a sequel to Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare, Sledgehammer Games can bring back a few weapons for a modern encore."

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
MaximusTKG488d ago

Here’s hoping that a sequel just doesn’t happen.

150°

Battlefield 1, Hardline, BF4 Servers Are Being Taken Offline by Cheaters; EA Silent on Issue

Cheaters & hackers have been causing grief on Battlefield 1, Hardline & BF4 servers, with nonstop DDoS attacks among other things. Unfortunately, EA has remained silent about it.

-Foxtrot763d ago

Course they are silent, they are hoping people flock to 2042

gamesftw250762d ago

Maybe it was a inside job then haha.

jeromeface762d ago

wouldnt be the first time, titanfall 1+2 anyone?

PapaBop762d ago

Not even if they paid me.. EA always do this with old games with less money potential, if this was Ultimate Team, they'd address and sort it faster than stories could spread. Why invest time in their products when they will just dump it in the following years? Then again EA never could see the forest for the trees.

Inverno762d ago

I imagine after those games were given out for free a couple months back through Amazon, anything that makes people go to 2042 is a plus for them

XiNatsuDragnel763d ago

They want people to go on 2042. My theory

excaliburps762d ago

Nah. I think they can't do anything about it or they want to sink money into fixing it.

Pudge102888762d ago (Edited 762d ago )

EA owns all BF servers so yes, they can do something about it but they refuse to because they dont want ppl playing their old games instead of the new one. Its EA we’re talking about here

pr33k33762d ago

if this happened in 2042, they'd have something to say. which is weird, considering battlefield 1 has more players on steam right now.

Pudge102888762d ago

Its so obvious that EA is doing this or hired ppl to mess up the games so that we’d be forced to have just 1 Battlefield working.

FPS_D3TH762d ago

Honestly it’s probably the devs themselves. They did an update to bf4 way back that kinda made assault rifles doo doo in hopes that people would flock to BF1 cuz BF4 was too perfect

Show all comments (15)