VERY deep meditation: Mummified 200-year-old remains of Buddhist monk who is still in the LOTUS POSITION are discovered in Mongolia 

  • Remains of a man found in the Songinokhairkhan province of Mongolia
  • The 200-year-old human relic was preserved in animal skin, experts say
  • Mummified remains found sitting in lotus position 'as if still meditating'
  • Experts have started a forensic examination in the capital Ulaanbataar

The amazing mummified remains of a man apparently meditating in the lotus position have been unearthed in Mongolia.

A forensic examination is underway on the human relic which is believed to be around 200 years old, after being preserved in animal skin.

'The mummified body sits in a lotus position, as if still meditating,' said a report in The Siberian Times - citing Mongolian accounts of the discovery.

The amazing mummified remains of a man apparently meditating in the lotus position were unearthed in Mongolia

The amazing mummified remains of a man apparently meditating in the lotus position have been unearthed in Mongolia

'Experts that only had time to carry basic visual test say they believe the body can be about 200 years old.'

The body was found on 27 January in Songinokhairkhan province, said Mongolia's 'Morning Newspaper'. It was covered in 'cattle skin'.

The human remains are now undergoing forensic examination in capital Ulaanbataar.

Initial speculation is that the mummy could be a teacher of Lama Dashi-Dorzho Itigilov.

Dashi-Dorzho Itigilov, born in 1852, was a Buryat Buddhist Lama of the Tibetan Buddhist tradition, best known for the lifelike state of his body.

His remains were reported not to be subject to macroscopic decay.

A forensic examination is underway on the 200-year-old human relic which was discovered in Mongolia (file picture, below)

A forensic examination is underway on the 200-year-old human relic which was discovered in Mongolia (file picture, below)

 

 

 

The comments below have not been moderated.

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.

We are no longer accepting comments on this article.