Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did you know the United Auto Workers (UAW) first negotiated domestic partner benefits in 1982?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 07:59 AM
Original message
Did you know the United Auto Workers (UAW) first negotiated domestic partner benefits in 1982?
Think about that for a minute. Thats more than 25 years ago. You think import car companies do the same for their employees?

http://www.working-families.org/newsletter/winter09.html

In Defense of Equality:
Unions Stand Up for LGBT Families


BY BRANDY DAVIS

In the 2008 election, Californians went to the ballot box in record numbers and cast votes on one of the most expensive and high profile initiatives in the country: Proposition 8, an initiative that would define marriage as between a man and a woman and eliminate the right of same sex couples to marry. Prominently standing in opposition to Proposition 8 were many California labor unions. Labor’s support for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) workers also goes beyond the ballot box. Unions across the country are bargaining for contracts that are inclusive of LGBT workers and their families in a critical area: equality in workplace benefits.

With the political climate in flux over same-sex marriage, LGBT families face an uncertain prospect of securing workplace benefits that enable them to keep their jobs and care for their families, including family and sick leave, and health and pension benefits. Only 16 states and the District of Columbia have domestic partnership laws that formerly recognize same-sex relationships. Equal Benefits Ordinances, which require government contractors to provide equal benefits to their LGBT workers, exist in only one state and a handful of localities. LGBT families were not included in the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), and only seven states have extended such benefits to unmarried partners in their state family and medical leave laws. Because Internal Revenue Service rules deny domestic partners the same tax benefits as spouses, LGBT workers who do have access to domestic partner benefits face additional tax burdens. According to T Santora, Co-President of Pride At Work, an AFL-CIO constituency group for LGBT workers in the labor movement, “The patchwork of legal protections across the country underscores the reason why a union contract is an LGBT worker’s best friend.”

Domestic Partner Benefits on the Rise

Since workers at the Village Voice in New York City and the United Auto Workers (UAW) first negotiated domestic partner benefits in 1982, a growing number of employers have followed. As of March 2006, 49% of the Fortune 500 offered domestic partner health benefits, compared to 25% in 2000. The trend toward domestic partner benefits is increasing regardless of business size, although the most substantial gains are among large employers. But many public and private sector LGBT workers do not have access to these benefits. In a 2003 study, 48% of LGBT workers identified domestic partner benefits as the most important consideration in a potential job change. And where state and federal laws provide little to no rights, union contracts provide the only protection.

"The patchwork of legal protections across the country underscores the reason why a union contract is an LGBT worker's best friend."

- T Santora, Co-President of Pride At Work


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. Happy to be the first rec
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yes, many foreign car companies do the same
http://www.gaywheels.com/gff/gayfriendly.htm

And it's great that the UAW pushed for this 25 years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Honda was considered non-gay-friendly last year at the link you provided
http://www.gaywheels.com/honda_takes_the_first_step_not.htm

Honda Takes the First Step - Not "Gay-Friendly" Yet

Monday, March 10, 2008 - Automotive News reported today that American Honda is now offering insurance benefits for their same-sex partners. Gaywheels.com applauds this decision but will not be changing Honda's classification as non-gay-friendly, yet.

The article points out that while Honda will be rolling out these benefits to some of their U.S.-based employees, not all employees of the company will have access to the same benefits. Gaywheels.com's classification for "gay-friendly" applies when all employees of a company in the U.S. are offered same-sex domestic-partner benefits.

This situation is similar to that of Nissan North America and BMW when they first began offering domestic-partner benefits. Both companies rolled out the benefit package for their sales and marketing employees first and offered them to their manufacturing employees at a later date.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Yes, but there are many other foreign automakers listed.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kokonoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
4. That was 25 years ago
Lets hope the unions stay strong enough to lead for justice, and keep the nonunion corporations following.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brickbat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
5. Another K&R for the "but unions are irrelevant" crowd.
The UAW also had a strong role in rights for black people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. If only Walter Reuther was still alive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brickbat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. We must continue his work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC